Paul,
> I think we can envisage that the proposed regime could be made to work by
> issuing content providers
> with Technical Capability Notices that would require the content provider to
> create asecure channel for
> access to the clear text, similar to how secure OOB can be enabled for
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Chad Kelly wrote:
> On 9/3/2018 12:00 PM, ausnog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net wrote:
>
> > The government is going to be able to enforce the Assistance and Access
> > Bill, because to operate a business in Australia, requires a local
> > presence. Your trade marks and
On 9/3/2018 12:00 PM, ausnog-requ...@lists.ausnog.net wrote:
The government is going to be able to enforce the Assistance and Access
Bill, because to operate a business in Australia, requires a local
presence. Your trade marks and intellectual property need recognition, and
you require a
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> "Sure they will be able to enforce it against others, but their whole
> argument for these laws is to go after those actors when it is manifestly
> ineffective for that."
>
> Yes, and no. There's actors, and then there's their actions. There's 2
>
Paul,
I agree with you in general as to the point that if we are happy with the
premise of the current TIA Act that LEAs should be able to intercept
communications with a duly authorised warrant, then extending that to encrypted
services seems a reasonable extension to keep up with
Bradley,
The Common Law has always allowed judicial scrutiny of our privacy. There's
always been the right for judicial search warrants to override what's
considered one's private domain. I'm supportive of this bill where it
extends judicial oversite to the cyber domain, which is a gap that exists
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 1:15 PM, Christian Heinrich
wrote:
> https://livestream.com/internetsociety/aussiesencrypt
Also https://twitter.com/isocny/status/1032276275690258432 and
https://youtu.be/kn8Baq2paEk and
https://www.facebook.com/InternetSociety/videos/275405293068989/
The only point I
So for the sake of catching someone doing something illegal online, we
should allow police the right to see everything we do online?
Well for the sake of the road toll, they should low jack all of our cars
and know what they are doing at all times.
For the sake of muggings, we should all have GPS
"Sure they will be able to enforce it against others, but their whole
argument for these laws is to go after those actors when it is manifestly
ineffective for that."
Yes, and no. There's actors, and then there's their actions. There's 2
different sorts of traffic on the internet that law
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> The government is going to be able to enforce the Assistance and Access Bill,
> because to operate a business in Australia,
> requires a local presence. Your trade marks and intellectual property need
> recognition, and you require a registered company
Hi Folks,
If there was anyone at the conference who picked up a Medium sized shirt, and
would prefer a Large instead, I'm up for a trade.
Email me off list to arrange.
Cheers,
-Brad.
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
11 matches
Mail list logo
