Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

Wonder if they throw in 2.5Mbps for you? Hahaha Kindest Regards, Nathan Brookfield (VK2NAB) From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Bevan Slattery Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2019 4:54 PM To: Joseph Goldman ; ausnog@lists.ausnog.net Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40 And pay the $8,000

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

And pay the $8,000/month for the CVC in case you use it… 😊 Hahahaha [b] From: AusNOG on behalf of Joseph Goldman Date: Wednesday, 10 April 2019 at 4:49 pm To: "ausnog@lists.ausnog.net" Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40 NBN can actually go up to 1000/400 if you have

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

NBN can actually go up to 1000/400 if you have an RSP prepared to offer it... On 2019-04-10 4:10 PM, Matthew Matters wrote: Actually NBN can now offer 100/100 across NBN on FTTP from what I believe. *From:*AusNOG *On Behalf Of *Russell Langton *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 April 2019 2:24 PM *To

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

I think the question was specific to Telstra Internet Direct over FTTP, not generally rsp available speeds. Telstra might choose not to deploy the higher speeds. Cheers, Chris On Wed., 10 Apr. 2019, 16:23 Robert Hudson, wrote: > Sorry, that's 250/100! > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 16:17, Robert

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

TID no, other providers, yes…. Kindest Regards, Nathan Brookfield (VK2NAB) Chief Executive Officer Simtronic Technologies Pty Ltd Local: (02) 4749 4949 | Fax: (02) 4749 4950 | Direct: (02) 4749 4951 Web: http://www.simtronic.com.au | E-mail: nathan.brookfi...@simtr

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

Sorry, that's 250/100! On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 16:17, Robert Hudson wrote: > 400/100 as well I believe. > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 16:11, Matthew Matters < > mmatt...@ausnetservers.net.au> wrote: > >> Actually NBN can now offer 100/100 across NBN on FTTP from what I >> believe. >> >> >> >> *From:

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

400/100 as well I believe. On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 16:11, Matthew Matters wrote: > Actually NBN can now offer 100/100 across NBN on FTTP from what I believe. > > > > *From:* AusNOG *On Behalf Of *Russell > Langton > *Sent:* Wednesday, 10 April 2019 2:24 PM > *To:* Matt Selbst > *Cc:* AusNOG@lis

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

Actually NBN can now offer 100/100 across NBN on FTTP from what I believe. From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Russell Langton Sent: Wednesday, 10 April 2019 2:24 PM To: Matt Selbst Cc: AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40 Hi Matt, 100/40 is the max currently

Re: [AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

Hi Matt, 100/40 is the max currently. On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 1:58 PM Matt Selbst wrote: > Have been trying the usual sales drones and getting no answers. I'm > calling on behalf of a customer. > > Does anyone know if Telstra Internet Direct (or whatever they're calling > it now) offers NBN serv

[AusNOG] Telstra Internet Direct NBN > 100/40

Have been trying the usual sales drones and getting no answers. I'm calling on behalf of a customer. Does anyone know if Telstra Internet Direct (or whatever they're calling it now) offers NBN services faster than 100/40 (obviously on FTTP). Thanks! -Matt

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

Some interesting stuff here: https://towardsdatascience.com/real-time-and-video-processing-object-detection-using-tensorflow-opencv-and-docker-2be1694726e5 https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/cognitive-services/face/face-api-how-to-topics/howtoanalyzevideo_face “If our analysis consiste

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

Thread out. Kind regards Paul Wilkins On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 12:03, wrote: > OK… > > > > Tin Eye is for image recognition, not video and it’s more concerned with > duplication… > > From a quick read of their site, it doesn’t appear to be a neural network > or AI… > > Did you bother reading my l

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

OK… Tin Eye is for image recognition, not video and it’s more concerned with duplication… >From a quick read of their site, it doesn’t appear to be a neural network or >AI… Did you bother reading my last post about scalability? Even if you used an algorithm like NSFW, it will scan one image

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

1 - Remove specified file based content and similar copies - doable, and reckless if not actioned by hosting providers. 2 - Proactively remove unspecified content of abhorrent violent nature - difficult, not reliable, and moot whether required under the legislation for hosting providers. Arguably

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

I feel like legislation will compel tech companies to implement human screening in some capacity, and there will be huge downsides to that - I mean, which is more likely: a) screening team members are offered abundant mental health support resources, given follow-through on reporting (that video y

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

I didn't know Tineye could tell if an image was violent or not. The existing systems work for copyright purposes, finding a similar match. This works to some extent currently, and can handle recompression, scaling, etc... It falls apart when an adversary wants to get around it however. But for

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

On Wed, 2019-04-10 at 10:56 +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > Now I would say that for instance, if the eSecurity Director posts > the CRC of a file as being "abhorrent violent" content, and your > company doesn't expeditiously take down that material, expect > problems down the pike. Numerous people h

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

https://tineye.com/search/f274c3b49edcca9a6d83994a43629445a5ea5a23/ On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 11:12, Matt Palmer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > > Now I would say that for instance, if the eSecurity Director posts the > CRC > > of a file as being "abhorrent

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 10:56:12AM +1000, Paul Wilkins wrote: > Now I would say that for instance, if the eSecurity Director posts the CRC > of a file as being "abhorrent violent" content, and your company doesn't > expeditiously take down that material, expect problems down the pike. I > doubt a C

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

We need to differentiate between what would meet industry standards of best practice, and the rather lower threshold of falling into the category of "recklessness". So company directors can either ask the question now, what threshold implementation clears the "recklessness" bar, or be faced with th

[AusNOG] Telstra TIPT/NIPT SIP issues

Hey all, Any Telstra TIPT customers on the list that have had any problems this morning? Our TIPT services failed at about 8:45 this morning (AEST), and after having a bit of a dig it looks to be a DNS resolution problem for sbc-nsw.nipt.telstra.com, which seems to be only reachable via the Tel

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

I'd argue that whenever gov.co sticks its fingers into tech on any level the outcome is never as expected... On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 8:06 AM Nick Stallman wrote: > The other part is that all the politicians keep whining about the > dominance of Facebook and Google. > Then they pass a law which

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

The other part is that all the politicians keep whining about the dominance of Facebook and Google. Then they pass a law which effectively cements their dominance in place. Facebook and Google are at a size where they can actually put some serious money and effort in to these kinds of video ana

Re: [AusNOG] More legislative interventions

Let's see this wonderful "fingerprint" Paul... Video fingerprinting is used for copyright purposes and is of no use in detecting "suspect" videos. The AI algorithm required to do this would require a lot of processing power. Just how is a provider supposed to finance the development of said algori