ensure the key remains
secure. This agency could operate as a CA for all such keys.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 15:33, Chris Ford
wrote:
>
> Paul,
>
> > I think we can envisage that the proposed regime could be made to work
> by issuing content providers
he fact of said search.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 11:47, Chris Ford
wrote:
> Paul,
>
>
> I agree with you in general as to the point that if we are happy with the
> premise of the current TIA Act that LEAs should be able to intercept
> communications wit
forcement to enforce
laws and to protect citizens rights, would be to limit the scope of these
new powers to judicial writ.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
a Retention. When it comes to isolating
actors with a serious agenda to use end to end to encryption for nefarious
means, I figure most everybody realises this is like looking for a needle
in a haystack.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Mon, 3 Sep 2018 at 01:07, wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 201
Australia.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 08:39, Mark Newton wrote:
> On 2 Sep 2018, at 04:35, Nick Stallman wrote:
>
> You could also say that parts of the internet are licensed - E.g. posting
> on Facebook requires accepting terms and conditions which if bro
subsection (5)
22(d) an executive
level sworn
IBAC Officer
(within the
meaning of that
Act) the chief
officer
authorises under
subsection (5)
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 22 Aug 2018 at 12:42, wrote:
> And it covers anyone running a website in Australia:
>
> https://www.afr.com
Fifield to his credit has given the job 3 years. Suggestions of short
termist pole driven policy making simply don't reflect the reality of his
term in office.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 24 Aug 2018 at 08:36, Kai wrote:
> Replace "the referees" with "(soc
government might be taking to alter this situation?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 14:31, Narelle Clark wrote:
>
> With great timing, Internet Australia and its parent the global Internet
> Society (ISOC) are hosting a number of international and national experts,
&g
c opposition.
Maintain the rage for when Barnaby Joyce proposes judicial wiretaps for
radio and television.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 16:57, Robert Hudson wrote:
> This bill has nothing to do with content on Facebook (or websites run by
> content creators, or e
ld give rise to unintended consequences, or fails to provide sufficient
safeguards and accountability for the use of those powers.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Sat, 18 Aug 2018 at 07:09, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
>
> https://www.reuters.com/art
ain.
Monday morning, customers are asking why they're offline. Security tell you
there was a search and siezure. You contact ASIS who know nothing about it.
Actually possible.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Fri, 17 Aug 2018 at 08:09, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au>
power to issue assistance notices/capability requests, while
simultaneously criminalising disclosure of both the terms and existence of
the notices. Journalists take note.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 13:20, Robert Hudson wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> We have already publ
It has allowed threats to representative
democracy to get ahead of the curve.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 11:16, Bradley Silverman <
bsilver...@staff.ventraip.com> wrote:
> @Paul I can tell a lawyer, priest, therapist or spouse my secrets and the
> judicial system
ences.
Remember that the bill will have been drafted by lawyers and Canberra
policy wonks, mostly not just technically ignorant but with a good measure
of technology misconceptions and prejudices.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 11:09, Paul Julian
wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
&g
he consequences
of discovery of admissible evidence. The cyber domain has always been
subject to the rule of law, same as the rest of society.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Thu, 16 Aug 2018 at 11:02, Christian Heinrich <
christian.heinr...@cmlh.id.au> wrote:
> https://www.crikey.com.au/20
ne with an interest in the evolution of our
industry should consider making a submission, or at least expressing by
proxy through a joint submission.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On Wed, 15 Aug 2018 at 13:31, Paul Brooks
wrote:
> Thanks Aftab for the plug - this is something that IA has been t
The covering blurb suggests all organised crime will be encrypted by 2020,
either that or they're not very organised.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 15 August 2018 at 10:54, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> So within the rule of law, and subject to judicial oversite, law
> enforcement a
's an investigation in process, similar
to wiretaps that are already done by law enforcement and the security
services.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 15 August 2018 at 08:07, Aftab Siddiqui wrote:
> Related to this - Internet Australia and Internet Society is holding an
> Experts Session on
;t support TLS
>> higher than 1.0 (is cleartext better than TLS1.0?)
>>
>> Then there's the elephant in the room when it comes to SMTP around
>> certificate verification, and if/how you determine your talking to the
>> correct mail server (at which point you have t
ntrol: 1139; Revision: 3; Updated: Apr-15; Applicability: UD, P,
C, S, TS; Compliance: should; Authority: AA
- Agencies *should use the latest version of TLS*
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 24 July 2018 at 11:10, Scott Howard wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 6:00 PM, Noel Butler
r problem
2 - There's the rest of the internet where any inbound server may attempt
TLS1.0
Best way forward is likely SSL intercept on an external facing MTA, that
supports TLS1.0 front end, TLS1.2 to the Exim servers on the back end.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 24 July 2018 at 07:24, Ma
PCI spec is pretty clear you're to have separation (virtual/physical)
between PCI and other environments.
OTOH, TPG SLA's do not require TLS1.0+.
Someone is going to have to sling for an external MTA.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 23 July 2018 at 16:01, Michael Junek wrote:
> J
is zero touch recovery, and
if there's any well supported software. Yes you can roll your own, but no,
Change Management just roll their eyes.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
ed? At the end of the day, you need a performant service, not finger
pointing between networks and services, and blaming performance on
insufficient network/proxy scale out.
Kind Regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausno
<133938>
First port of call 13 39 38 <133938>. Then if no joy, whois their ASN.
On 14 June 2018 at 15:11, Joseph Goldman wrote:
> Anyone got a sure-fire way to reach Exetel NOC (or anyone on-list)? Or
> know of any major issues they are having? Having some reachability issues
> with them over
For those who came in late. Specifically mentions Linksys, MikroTik,
Netgear Inc, TP-Link.
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/25/router-hacking-russia-fbi
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http
cause sampling is isochronous, not synchronous).
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 24 May 2018 at 15:37, David Fowler wrote:
> Hi folks
>
>
>
> Does anyone know if it’s possible to enter in a lower BC value in a
> Shaping policy? Seems with this platform the lowest is 6 bits… this
So when people say they've lost 000, how do they know?
Furthermore, you obviously don't want the entire industry checking their
000 upon an announced 000 outage.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 22 May 2018 at 09:10, Serge Burjak wrote:
> http://www.commsalliance.com.au/__data/as
how would you know without actually
calling?
Of course, back in the day, 000 was such that you didn't need automated
tests. A test upon service commission was all that was necessary.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 21 May 2018 at 10:38, Matt Hare wrote:
> Appears to be widespread, saw
ender
stereotypes. In light of which, henceforth, thinking people should rather
refer to this vector as a Person in the Middle Attack.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
000 goes down. Blame it on the fiber, close the ticket.
Zounds.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 4 May 2018 at 09:14, Adam Baxter wrote:
> I have a customer on iprimus in Bundaberg who cannot route to Telstra in
> Brisbane...
>
>
> On 4 May 2018 at 08:58, Evan Dent wrote:
&g
Mercifully, I managed to find this from actual lawyers, which explains the
legal landscape for those interested in the detail.
metadata - Gilbert + Tobin
<https://www.gtlaw.com.au/file/10841/download?token=b7MKFd6q>
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 3 May 2018 at 09:08, Paul Wilkins
Regards section 282 certs, s282 of which Act / Regulation?
Near as l can see, all disclosure provisions in the Act itself are either
voluntary, or require a warrant, where the police need to locate a caller
in a life threatening situation the one exception.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 2 May
Data Retention without a judicial writ, I'd
be grateful, and it would be news to me.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 2 May 2018 at 11:23, Ross Wheeler wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2018, Paul Wilkins wrote:
>
> I am not a lawyer. This is not legal opinion.
>>
>
> I don
t.
My take is that the judge issuing the warrant is responsible for ensuring
the officer requesting the warrant is duly authorised.
I am not a lawyer. This is not legal opinion.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 2 May 2018 at 10:45, Ross Wheeler wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 2 May 2018, Paul
inary
police, not the intelligence agencies) would be either under or compatible
with the Telecommunications (Interception and Access) Act 1979.
I am not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 1 May 2018 at 11:28, Ross Wheeler wrote:
>
>
> I was recently ta
.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 2 May 2018 at 02:00, Paul Brooks wrote:
> On 1/05/2018 7:19 AM, Matthew Moyle-Croft wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >
> > This happens because people aren’t validating CLID on interconnects.
> It’s not really
> > about secur
not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 28 April 2018 at 09:18, Peter Tiggerdine wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I never said the vendor has no preexisting relationship and the thread has
> proven that consumer law applies.
>
> Regards,
>
> Peter Tigger
r testing hardware being brought
in from non preexisting support arrangements, and charge the equivalent of
18 months support for doing it.
I am not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 27 April 2018 at 22:43, Karen Hargreave wrote:
> Devils advocate her
Well the problem's fixable, so caveat emptor due diligence etc. the
consumer now knows they're buying a flawed CPU. The question is whether
Intel should drop their price point 30% to account for the diminished CPU.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 14 January 2018 at 11:20, Michelle Sulli
with this performance hit, does that mean we have to buy more Intel
> Servers to cope O_o
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *Burt Mascareigne Mobile* 0414 450 962 *Office* (02) 9965 5422
> *Address* Level 19, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney NSW 2000
&g
Fix for security bug in Intel CPUs will be released patch Tuesday, and
predictions are of a 5 - 30% performance hit.
This is a problem in cloud, but I'm sure it will all be good on the day :)
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
A
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/14/net-neutrality-fcc-rules-open-internet
Kind regards
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/dec/11/net-neutrality-vint-cerf-tim-berners-lee-fcc-letter
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2017/nov/21/net-neutrality-rules-to-be-ditched-as-expected-fcc-decision-sparks-protests
Voting on the repeal set for 14th December.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http
n the
definition and scope of SLAs.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 9 October 2017 at 11:50, Cameron Murray wrote:
> Guys
>
> Sorry for the noise but can anyone recommed a tender writer with heavy
> experience in connectivity located in Brisbane?
>
> Your recommendations are mu
Just so. If you care about configuration control and change management,
you'll be using structured cabling with access from the front of the rack.
You really don't need to be fiddling around in the back of a rack,
wondering about which port goes where.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On
Sure, but when one observes the default vendor position is front to back
airflow, if one then applies logic, you can conclude back to front is
deployed as a cost cutting measure sans structured cabling.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 4 October 2017 at 16:10, Jay Dixon wrote:
> I think Sa
tc etc etc. These then likely are
all on different firewall interfaces/firewalls in different zones requiring
different routing and security.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 4 October 2017 at 15:41, Sam Silvester wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 2:38 PM, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>
airly ubiquitous.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 4 October 2017 at 14:56, Sam Silvester wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>> There's enterprise racks, and SP racks and I'd say to generalise,
>> Enterprise do the ports to the front t
There's enterprise racks, and SP racks and I'd say to generalise,
Enterprise do the ports to the front to structured cabling, while SPs will
reverse mount for shorter wire runs and density. Also swapping out reverse
mounted switches is a huge pain.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 4 Octob
nly, no
windows.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 29 September 2017 at 12:34, Nick Kamenyitzky
wrote:
> There are link utilisation thresholds for when a link gets upgraded. It
> is in the NBN WBA. I don't believe there is any external oversight though
> so NBN could say anything really
02) 9965 5422
> *Address* Level 19, 1 O’Connell Street, Sydney NSW 2000
> *Web* http://www.stormnetwork.com.au
>
>
>
> *From:* AusNOG [mailto:ausnog-boun...@lists.ausnog.net] *On Behalf Of *Mark
> Smith
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 19 September 2017 6:34 PM
> *To:* Paul Wilkins
> *Cc:*
> *
"you just have to try your best" goes only as far as the provider's
internal network and systems. There's no provision for protection of the
data plane or services delivered to third parties.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 19 September 2017 at 17:25, Eric Pinkerton wrote:
&
Yep. It's now law.
Telecommunications and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2017
<http://parlinfo.aph.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22legislation%2Fbillhome%2Fs1051%22>
(I am not a lawyer. This is not expert opinion).
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 19 Septem
Probably when the Federal Government/ACMA grants you a carrier license.
Compliance is a cost of doing business, rather than corner cutting, and
having the state/taxpayer pick up the bill for the subsequent train wreck
(think solo round the world sailors).
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 19
bt there's a
mandate even to compel use of RPF/BCP 38.
In practice, professional organisations will be little affected, because
frankly it will be a cold day in hell before government are aware leave
alone act on a vulnerability before secops have already closed the breach.
Kind regards
Paul
oss, and improve the customer experience, all while branded
as the same bandwidth of service.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 18 September 2017 at 12:41, paul+aus...@oxygennetworks.com.au <
paul+aus...@oxygennetworks.com.au> wrote:
> Hi All, I was hoping to gain some thoughts from the lis
Prior to the US FCC voting to remove Title II classification for broadband,
the FCC has been deluged by a petiition with over 22 million comments -
mostly from spam bots. Oh the humanity.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG
Is obscure subtlety really a form of condescension?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 25 August 2017 at 16:49, Mark Newton wrote:
> On Aug 21, 2017, at 12:27 AM, Paul Wilkins
> wrote:
>
>
> the content providers who want a premium service, and the advertisers,
> whose business m
riage with bulk data.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 20 August 2017 at 14:23, Mark Smith wrote:
> So I'm trying to parse that ...
>
> On 20 August 2017 at 13:50, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> > It's interesting that we're seeing around the globe a push to impose by
>
arket, and
legislatively imposed externalities, we'll continue to see content
industries subsidising the advertisers.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 20 August 2017 at 11:49, Mark Smith wrote:
> Geoff arrived early, tried out QoS, wrote a book on it, then gave up on it.
>
> http://www.po
ation (DSCP) and for carriers to have a price incentive
(tiered pricing) to prioritise traffic.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 20 August 2017 at 11:07, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> For those who arrived late, this 2015 article goes to some length to
> elaborate on the QoS ramifications of the FCC
For those who arrived late, this 2015 article goes to some length to
elaborate on the QoS ramifications of the FCC's Title II ruling for
broadband:
https://www.cnet.com/news/13-things-you-need-to-know-about-the-fccs-net-neutrality-regulation/L
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 19 August 2017
bulk transfer. And then leave it to customer behaviour and
customer choice to choose what best suits their needs.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 18 August 2017 at 17:41, Mark Newton wrote:
> Not quite what I was getting at.
>
> I mean, sure, it’s going to be dependent on his custome
s concerns. For
one thing, there could be uncontained outbursts of spontaneous dancing in
Krakow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z4q6W4inJqk
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
___
AusNOG mailing list
AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net
http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
r business, but anything beyond a simple
name/value match is up to you, as it's not provided by the protocol. Add to
which GLBs that CNAME everything, which is arguably an infraction of the
standards.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 17 June 2017 at 11:52, Luke wrote:
>
> DNS do
ou hardly have grounds to complain if you won't
engage in constructive public debate, which is how government policy
actually happens, regardless of what some might think.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 15 June 2017 at 17:44, Robert Hudson wrote:
> I concur.
>
> Providing an alter
ight to
privacy trumps all other rights. Accepting that, we can have a public
debate about the necessary checks and balances.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 13 June 2017 at 21:25, Mark Smith wrote:
> On 13 June 2017 at 20:50, grenville armitage
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
rly do you take exception?
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 13 June 2017 at 20:02, Mark Smith wrote:
> Are you trolling?
>
> On 13 June 2017 at 19:53, Paul Wilkins wrote:
> > When we talk of Privacy as a fundamental principle of democracy since the
> > days of Magna Carta,
slation failing to keep pace with technology.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
On 13 June 2017 at 19:11, Robert Hudson wrote:
> It is expensive in many ways - to achieve near-real time interception and
> decryption (in-flight or at-rest) basically requires the keys. Elsewise it
> can't be
eds
of what has grown into a global platform requiring confidentiality and
authenticity, never part of the original internet blueprint. The root cause
being the lack of a data protocol that can deliver end to end security, and
the lack of a security plane in the ISO stack.
Kind regards
Paul Wilkins
201 - 272 of 272 matches
Mail list logo
