Hi all,
Bigpond mail servers appear to be having some issues today; may wish to
route traffic to only 203.36.172.106 until this rectifies itself.
If someone with the correct contact could give them a poke too, I'm sure
they'd appreciate it.
extmail.bigpond.com.30 IN A 203.36.
The issue rectified itself as best I could tell last night sometime. I
only checked quite late in the day.
All of the test locations that were failing yesterday appear to be
working properly today. I even took out my mitigations of avoiding the
2nd IP address and haven't had any bounces again.
I
It would be much better if we could return to the previous function of
immediate email of the password to the registrant contact email address.
There is no benefit to forcing engagement with the losing registrar,
especially when they are non-cooperative or cactus.
Case in point - the "this is not
Works quite well. This is a huge step forward from the phone call, or go
talk to the existing recalcitrant registrar first method.
In regards to where the email has gone, this is still available via the
web based whois system. Wish list for the same page, but still available
for now.
I also ponde
On 24/07/18 13:46, Ted Cooper wrote:
> Works quite well. This is a huge step forward from the phone call, or go
> talk to the existing recalcitrant registrar first method.
Update on this one .. make sure copy down the information from the web
page as it doesn't stay there! The link obv
On 24/07/18 15:22, Mark Foster wrote:
> Oh good. Port 465. Another Depreciated thing :-)
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15796530/what-is-the-difference-between-ports-465-and-587
>
> There's no longer a reason to offer services on Port 465 :S
>
> Not really relevant to the OP problem, bu
The DNS signatures just expired. Everything just went boom.
RRSIG net.au/DS alg 8, id 62233: The Signature Expiration field of the
RRSIG RR (2023-09-18 00:05:29+00:00) is 15 minutes in the past.
https://dnsviz.net/d/abc.net.au/ZQeX9w/dnssec/
On 18/9/23 10:20, Luke Thompson wrote:
We've got m
