>From the 2018-01-04 conference call, re Bug 1068:
"We agree with the concept of using port 0 to get an ephemeral port may be done
in a robust, portable, manner, but do not believe that it is appropriate for
the Austin Group to define this behavior. This should be done by IETF/IANA and
after
There’s quite a lot of change and I couldn’t catch up.
The “My View” section in the bug reporter no longer shows old bugs.
I’d like to know how had we resolved the “binding to system-assigned port” bug,
If we had resolved it.
Thanks.
Dear all
Just a note that the following bugs have interpretations proposed and
are starting a 30 day final review.
0001143 Base Definitions and Headerscancellation points: contradiction
between base definition and rationale
0001140 Shell and Utilities must the encoded output end with
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1143
==
Reported By:dstaesse
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1140
==
Reported By:Villemoes
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1038
==
Reported By:kre
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1039
==
Reported By:kre
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1078
==
Reported By:Florian Weimer
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1072
==
Reported By:quinngrier
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1105
==
Reported By:stephane
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1073
==
Reported By:EdSchouten
Assigned To:
The following issue has been UPDATED.
==
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1210
==
Reported By:geoffclare
Assigned To:
12 matches
Mail list logo