On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, at 12:51 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
>> I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless
>
> It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the
> 'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as
On 8/18/22 09:38, Khem Raj wrote:
I think the autoconf patch should be good on its own merits regardless
It partly depends on how much we care about compatibility. Putting the
'void' in there will break pre-C89 compilers, as well as C++ compilers
pretending (badly) to be C compilers. I doubt
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 8:22 AM Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> On 8/17/22 23:58, Khem Raj wrote:
> > rsync which add -pedantic-errors option to cflags during configure
>
> OK, that's the problem then. 'configure' should not use flags like
> -pedantic-errors. This has long been a property of 'autoconf'-gen
On 8/17/22 23:58, Khem Raj wrote:
rsync which add -pedantic-errors option to cflags during configure
OK, that's the problem then. 'configure' should not use flags like
-pedantic-errors. This has long been a property of 'autoconf'-generated
scripts.
The simplest way to fix this would be for
