I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
Since I bootstrap using automake from its "next" branch, it's
enabled for me. And that translates to enhanced Makefile.in
files in the tarballs I generate. The net result is that
On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
Since I bootstrap using automake from its "next" branch, it's
enabled for me. And that translates to enhanced Makefile.in
files in the t
Hi Bob, Jim,
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:40:16PM CET:
> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
>
>> I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
>> that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
[...]
>> CC id.o
>
> What happens when things go wr
On Saturday 2009-03-28 16:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>Hi Bob, Jim,
>
>* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:40:16PM CET:
>> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>
>>> I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
>>> that I'm making it the default (when possible) for co
* Daniel Richard G. wrote on Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 08:54:10AM CET:
> >
> > Looks like automake is as confused as you are. For now, here's a
> > simple workaround, using a helper variable that is not special to
> > automake:
>
> Oh, a workaround's not a problem; the bug is very narrow. In my case,
El Sábado 28 Marzo 2009ES 17:14:10 Jan Engelhardt escribió:
> On Saturday 2009-03-28 16:44, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >Hi Bob, Jim,
> >
> >* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 04:40:16PM CET:
> >> On Sat, 28 Mar 2009, Jim Meyering wrote:
> >>> I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules opt
Jim Meyering wrote:
I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
Well, if you think such a step to be helpful, I disagree.
Since I bootstrap using automake from its "next" branch, it's
enabled for me. And that translates
Ralf Corsepius writes:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Since I bootstrap using automake from its "next" branch, it's
>> enabled for me. And that translates to enhanced Makefile.in
>> files in the tarballs I generate. The net result is that when
>> you run "make" (using distributed Makefile.in files),
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> I like automake's upcoming --silent-rules option enough
>> that I'm making it the default (when possible) for coreutils.
> Well, if you think such a step to be helpful, I disagree.
Then you can build with "make V=1".
>> Since I bootstrap using autom
