Re: another perl coverage run

2010-12-16 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
FWIW, I've put up coverage data for one of the runs back then at . Only the /tmp/automake and /tmp/build parts are interesting really. The rest is from the 'libtool --help' part which was still broken back then. And yes, I guess a more

Re: another perl coverage run

2010-11-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Updated summary including the 'libtool --help' fixes, shortened file names, and without listing the installed files from Autoconf. The Total percentages still include them however. filestmt bran cond subpodtime total lib/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm

Re: another perl coverage run

2010-11-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28:17AM CET: > Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently, > so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held > hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected > the results. They are in a set o

Re: another perl coverage run

2010-11-20 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: > Hello automake list readers, > Hi Ralf. > > Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently, > so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held > hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected

another perl coverage run

2010-11-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
Hello automake list readers, Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently, so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected the results. They are in a set of HTML pages roughly 500K size, the toplev