FWIW, I've put up coverage data for one of the runs back then at
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/coverage/coverage.html.
Only the /tmp/automake and /tmp/build parts are interesting really.
The rest is from the 'libtool --help' part which was still broken
back then.
And yes, I guess a more
Hello automake list readers,
Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently,
so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held
hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected
the results. They are in a set of HTML pages roughly 500K size,
the
On Saturday 20 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
Hello automake list readers,
Hi Ralf.
Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently,
so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held
hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected
the
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 10:28:17AM CET:
Stefano asked for coverage information about Automake recently,
so I triggered another 'make check-coverage' on my system, held
hands of Devel::Cover a bit, waited a looong time, then collected
the results. They are in a set of
Updated summary including the 'libtool --help' fixes, shortened file
names, and without listing the installed files from Autoconf. The Total
percentages still include them however.
filestmt bran cond subpodtime
total
