Re: [PATCH] {maint} python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches

2011-02-13 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Friday 11 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: Hi Stefano, * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 12:10:15AM CET: Subject: [PATCH] python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches [...] * tests/python-vars.test: New test, checking that AM_PATH_PYTHON correctly set

Re: [PATCH] {maint} python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET: OK to apply? I will push in 72 hours if there are no further objections. The patch is OK as it is a strict improvement IIUC, but I still have a question below. Thanks, Ralf Subject: [PATCH] python: fix spurious failure in

Re: [PATCH] {maint} python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches

2011-02-13 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Sunday 13 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET: OK to apply? I will push in 72 hours if there are no further objections. The patch is OK as it is a strict improvement IIUC, but I still have a question below. Thanks,

Re: [PATCH] {maint} python: extend and improve tests, fix minor glitches

2011-02-13 Thread Ralf Wildenhues
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:09:03PM CET: On Sunday 13 February 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote: * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:49:28AM CET: + cat pythondir + case `cat pythondir` in '$${prefix}'/*);; *) exit 1;; esac + cat pyexecdir + case