Re: * tests/amhello-binpkg.test: Add missing $EXEEXT usage.

2011-09-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2011-09-05 11:37 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > Ouch! Silly me for not thinking about that. > > And the quoting was off too, should have been s/\././g to > do what you intended... :-) > Double ouch, you're right again! $ x=`echo

Re: * tests/amhello-binpkg.test: Add missing $EXEEXT usage.

2011-09-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-09-05 11:37 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Den 2011-09-05 10:06 skrev Stefano Lattarini: >>> On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: Hi! >>> Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. >>> This fixes a fail on Cygwin (and others I s

[PATCH] {testsuite-work} installcheck: support it in our own testsuite

2011-09-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
I will push this in a couple of days; reviews are welcome. * tests/defs-static.in ($am_running_installcheck): New variable. Initialize it to a default of "no", and sanity-check its value. ($am_datadir, $am_docdir, $am_m4dir, $am_bindir, $am_scriptdir, $am_pkgvdir): New variables, initialized from

Re: * tests/amhello-binpkg.test: Add missing $EXEEXT usage.

2011-09-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Den 2011-09-05 10:06 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > > On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > >> Hi! > >> > > Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. > > > >> This fixes a fail on Cygwin (and others I suppose). > >> > >> I'm aware that the lax non-gn

Re: * tests/amhello-binpkg.test: Add missing $EXEEXT usage.

2011-09-05 Thread Peter Rosin
Den 2011-09-05 10:06 skrev Stefano Lattarini: > On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: >> Hi! >> > Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. > >> This fixes a fail on Cygwin (and others I suppose). >> >> I'm aware that the lax non-gnu-tar branch adds even more laxness >> since $EXEEXT normally cont

Re: * tests/amhello-binpkg.test: Add missing $EXEEXT usage.

2011-09-05 Thread Stefano Lattarini
On Monday 05 September 2011, Peter Rosin wrote: > Hi! > Hi Peter, thanks for the patch. > This fixes a fail on Cygwin (and others I suppose). > > I'm aware that the lax non-gnu-tar branch adds even more laxness > since $EXEEXT normally contains a dot for the oddball cases when > it's non-empty, b