On Friday 01 April 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:03:01PM CEST:
On Thursday 31 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't tested on MinGW recently, and haven't tested branch-1.11 in a
longer while. The limit was 32K for argv plus
On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:47:44PM CEST:
So I've seized this opportunity to do some minor refactoring and extending
in
the tests for the maintainer-clean target. The resulting simple patch
(for
maint) is
On Thursday 31 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 03:27:18PM CEST:
On Wednesday 30 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
A general comment: if you keep on adding tests to maint, it will break
branch-1.11 in the long run, in the sense that
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 10:03:01PM CEST:
On Thursday 31 March 2011, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
I haven't tested on MinGW recently, and haven't tested branch-1.11 in a
longer while. The limit was 32K for argv plus environment IIRC.
But then we should be pretty safe on
Hello automakers. While looking at the test aclocal6.test (during the attemp
of tackling http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8365) I noticed
this comment:
# Make sure maintainer-clean works in VPATH builds.
# (This is unrelated to the rest of this test.)
Having two very unrelated
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 05:47:44PM CEST:
So I've seized this opportunity to do some minor refactoring and extending in
the tests for the maintainer-clean target. The resulting simple patch (for
maint) is attached. A quick grep maintainer-clean *.test should show
