On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:39:04PM CET:
> > On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
> > > Is rx a package? Where did you find traces
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 01:39:04PM CET:
> On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
> > Is rx a package? Where did you find traces to it?
> There was this in automake.texi:
> "@cindex rx pac
On Saturday 13 November 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
> > * m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
>
> I think technically "obsolete" is right here, without trailing "d".
OK. All instances fixed.
> > and te
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 12:32:49PM CET:
> * m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
I think technically "obsolete" is right here, without trailing "d".
> and tell that it should be removed two years from now.
s/tell/state/
> (AM_WITH_REGEX): Raise
OK for master?
* m4/regex.m4: Document the `AM_WITH_REGEX' macro as obsoleted,
and tell that it should be removed two years from now.
(AM_WITH_REGEX): Raise an m4-time warning of the "obsolete"
category when this macro is used.
* doc/automake.texi (Public Macros): Move description of
`AM_WITH_REGE
