Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Harald Braumann
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:25:30 -1000 Jason Axelson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Harald Braumann > wrote: > > It's not possible. It's an X thing, nothing awesome can do about it. > > When a window appears, there's no way in general to map it to the > > process that created it. > > Bu

Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Jason Axelson
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Harald Braumann wrote: > It's not possible. It's an X thing, nothing awesome can do about it. > When a window appears, there's no way in general to map it to the > process that created it. But perhaps it might be possible to write a custom "mapper/launcher progra

Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Harald Braumann
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:39:00 -0400 Matt Seburn wrote: > That might help, thank you. > > This shouldn't be difficult to change.. I think it should be a matter > of saving the tag number when the client is called, rather than when > it is opened.. but maybe that is done behind the scenes in the C

Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Jason Axelson
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 7:39 AM, Matt Seburn wrote: > This shouldn't be difficult to change.. I think it should be a matter > of saving the tag number when the client is called, rather than when > it is opened.. but maybe that is done behind the scenes in the C code. I think the hard part is mapp

Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Matt Seburn
That might help, thank you. This shouldn't be difficult to change.. I think it should be a matter of saving the tag number when the client is called, rather than when it is opened.. but maybe that is done behind the scenes in the C code. Thanks, Matt On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Rob wrote:

Re: [la...@mail.lamafam.org: Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called]

2009-10-29 Thread Matt Seburn
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Gerry LaMontagne wrote: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Matt Seburn wrote: >> Hi all, I've been using Awesome for a while now and absolutely love >> it.. however this one thing has been annoying me since the beginning. >> >> When I open a new client it

Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Rob
I think we had something similar before: http://www.mail-archive.com/awesome@naquadah.org/msg01749.html Not sure how relevant it is, though

[la...@mail.lamafam.org: Re: Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called]

2009-10-29 Thread Gerry LaMontagne
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:17:15PM -0400, Matt Seburn wrote: > Hi all, I've been using Awesome for a while now and absolutely love > it.. however this one thing has been annoying me since the beginning. > > When I open a new client it always opens on the *currently* active > tag, rather than the o

Force client to open on tag that was active when it was called

2009-10-29 Thread Matt Seburn
Hi all, I've been using Awesome for a while now and absolutely love it.. however this one thing has been annoying me since the beginning. When I open a new client it always opens on the *currently* active tag, rather than the one that was active when it was called. In many cases this isn't an iss