Re: control-c problems

2009-09-16 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:50:25 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: > > At Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:40:03 +0200, > Julien Danjou wrote: > > > > [1 ] > > At 1253100504 time_t, Eric S Fraga wrote: > > > Note that I am not running 3.3.3 (in reference to some people saying > > > that the problem was introduced in th

Re: control-c problems

2009-09-16 Thread Eric S Fraga
At Wed, 16 Sep 2009 14:40:03 +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > [1 ] > At 1253100504 time_t, Eric S Fraga wrote: > > Note that I am not running 3.3.3 (in reference to some people saying > > that the problem was introduced in that version, according to the > > changelog information). > > s/introduce

Re: control-c problems

2009-09-16 Thread Julien Danjou
At 1253100504 time_t, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Note that I am not running 3.3.3 (in reference to some people saying > that the problem was introduced in that version, according to the > changelog information). s/introduced/fixed/ Cheers, -- Julien Danjou // ᐰhttp://julien.danjou.info // 9A0D 5F

Re: control-c problems

2009-09-16 Thread David Soulayrol
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:28:24PM +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: > I also have a problem with xterms no longer responding to Control-c. > I am running a Debian testing+unstable mix with the following > versions of awesome related packages: > > ii awesome3.3.2-1 > ii awesome-extra

control-c problems

2009-09-16 Thread Eric S Fraga
I also have a problem with xterms no longer responding to Control-c. I am running a Debian testing+unstable mix with the following versions of awesome related packages: ii awesome3.3.2-1 ii awesome-extra 2009072701 Note that I am not running 3.3.3 (in reference to some