On 15.12.10 00:01, Daniel wrote:
>
> I tried out different terminal emulators, and found out that urxvt is a
> little bit better at keeping its window contents, even if it is resized
> to become rather small. It has some flaws but its better than xterm.
urxvt is the terminal that causes the least
I tried out different terminal emulators, and found out that urxvt is a
little bit better at keeping its window contents, even if it is resized
to become rather small. It has some flaws but its better than xterm.
I also came across the daemon mode, with urxvtd and urxvtc, which was a nice
memory-
Uli Schlachter znc.in> writes:
> > (On a side note, I also wonder if awesome supports NOT resizing windows
> > while they reside in the right stack, so that when they are moved to master
> > position, they will have kept their contents (in case of programs/window
> > which are not able to redraw t
