On 15.12.10 00:01, Daniel wrote: > > I tried out different terminal emulators, and found out that urxvt is a > little bit better at keeping its window contents, even if it is resized > to become rather small. It has some flaws but its better than xterm.
urxvt is the terminal that causes the least pain here, too. > > I also came across the daemon mode, with urxvtd and urxvtc, which was a nice > memory-conservative feature. In replacing my terminal launcher with urxvtc > I found that sometimes, just sometimes, a newly opened terminal (as master) > doesn't get focus. Focus is still in the old master, which was shifted > to the stack. I couldn't get a pattern for when it happens. Sometimes > every tenth terminal. Sometimes five in a row. I stopped using the daemon-mode that day, one of the terminals crashed so badly, all the others were dead too. Since that day I use single processes for every window again. I just don't want that risk. A few MB free RAM are not worth it. And if the Memory consumtion of your terminals really is a problem: buy more RAM! :-) - Klaus -- To unsubscribe, send mail to awesome-unsubscr...@naquadah.org.