I'll let someone familiar with how the AWT/Swing use all of those
metrics respond on whether you've scaled all the right ones, but I
wanted to make a minor comment about how the scaling is done.
If you inverted it so that scale was 96f/dpi then you could use
multiplication everywhere instead o
Transitivity (2) violated:
X:
java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor[mimetype=text/uri-list;representationclass=java.nio.ByteBuffer;charset=UTF-8],
Y:
java.awt.datatransfer.DataFlavor[mimetype=application/x-java-text-encoding;representationclass=java.io.InputStream],
Z:
java.awt.datatransfer.Dat
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 07/06/2015 04:20 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
In the fix for JDK-7188942 I forgot to cleanup the mapfiles when I
removed initPbuffer() method.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130525
Webrev can be fo
On 7/6/2015 2:17 PM, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130242
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8130242/webrev.00/
Data transfer's flavor comparator violates transitivity.
Could you give an example of DataF
Hello.
Please review the fix for jdk9.
In the fix for JDK-7188942 I forgot to cleanup the mapfiles when I
removed initPbuffer() method.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130525
Webrev can be found at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8130525/webrev.00
--
Best regards, Sergey.
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8130242
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8130242/webrev.00/
Data transfer's flavor comparator violates transitivity.
--Semyon
Hi Sergey,
UnsupportedFlavorException is thrown because clipboard has something
that can't be translated to application/x-java-url.
You should copy link from Safari or copy file from finder, only then you
will see MalformedURLException.
So testing requires manual actions, because we need a co
Thanks.
On 7/2/2015 5:18 PM, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Hi,
you already have two reviewers, it is sufficient to push.
Anyway, the fix looks good to me.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 07/02/2015 10:28 AM, pooja chopra wrote:
Hi All,
Please review below fix.
Regards,
Pooja
On 6/17/2015 12:05 PM, pooja
Thanks.
On 7/2/2015 5:13 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
+1
On 02.07.15 14:41, Alexander Zvegintsev wrote:
Looks fine to me.
Thanks,
Alexander.
On 07/02/2015 10:29 AM, pooja chopra wrote:
Hi All,
Please review below fix.
Regards,
Pooja
On 6/17/2015 12:06 PM, pooja chopra wrote:
Hi All ,
Gentle