Hi All,
Thanks for the input.
I've did some testing with the all the possibility that you guys mentioned
and in my case the problem is On hand Revaluation.
You are right James.
System will force to split between the Closed and Open Transaction.
But another challenge is: when system split the
Sorry Jens,
If I can get a moment I will try to look at the class and see if my memory
can be brought back...
Harry any idea/pointers as I think you might have been getting your hands
dirty in this closing class area...?
Thanks
James
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@
Hi Raj,
Not trying to spoil anything by in Yuliana's example there is only 1
inventtrans on the PO and also only one on the in bound Quarantine order
part BUT the two appear only on the oubound (Quarantine wh back to normal
warehouse), so I don't think your scenario is what has happened I am af
Hi,
If I understand you correctly, you can are trying to create an inquiry form
that will display sum qty of sale line group by item group. This inquiry
form is then called from sales order.
That can be achieved by creating view of three tables, salesline,
inventtable and inventitemgroup.
This
Yuliana,
I can confidently tell you this is what must have happened:
- The user must have 1st created the PO line with Qty 80 and then must have changed it to 100. With this you get 2 records in the inventtrans.
- Now when you receive this on pack slip and if your Quarantine is
Hello all,
I must create a form called since the customer order
form which must contain the sum of the quantities (of
sales lines ordered by item group) by "item group"
for Ex :
Item Group "Parts" = 10
(line1 qty=3 + line3 qty=7
line1 and line3 belong to the same item group)
Item Group "
Hi,
I have the following requirement:
A table modelling variable shows the user a list of possible items
to
choose from based on i.e. Inventtable (ranged on item
type "items"). The item list shown to the user should however be
limited based on a selection the user made earlier in the dial
Thanks James,
Would have been nice if your memory was up-to-speed ... :-)
I could spend my time with something more exciting than removing markings
... :-)
/Jens
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af James
Flavell
Sen
Hi Yuliana,
The other Problems for such splitting may be Marking or reservation.
Just check whether any Marking is done for the particular Purchase order
line(Inventory-> marking Button).
Regards
Sundar
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL
Hi
Put a debug on the update method of class inventsplittrans and run
through the functionality you should be able to catch the scenario.
Alternatively check all the fields on the split transaction and see if
there is any difference for any field.
Regards
Harry
-Original Message-
F
Hi Jens,
Yes marking can be a real pain in the costing...I recall long ago I did a
very quick modificaiton in a class that basically just ignored all marking
during recalc or closing (this saves you having to check and remove
etc)...unfortunately I cannot remember where or what it was I did :(
Hi Harry,
This transaction is PO Transaction not SO Transaction.
Yes, we've activated the auto reservation, but I don't thing this is
something to do with reservation right?
Can you explain why this is something to do with reservation?
Thanks,
Yuliana
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-K
Hi
Turn off all auto-reservations and see if this problem goes away
Regards
harry
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James
Flavell
Sent: 26 April 2006 10:27
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE:
The auto addition is just to get the system to always try to summ back split
transactions.
Ii will sum them back together if ALL the non qty and value fields on the
inventtrans match so of course you cannot sum trans that have different del
note numbers etc.
You can try summing them together I
Hi,
Just to add around the costing side. If you add a new inventory item and do
not enter the cost of the item on the item master and you are using
quarantine orders. The cost of the item that ends up in your warehouse (not
quarantine) is incorrect.
Regards
Craig
_
Hi Sundar,
Ok, now I know.
Mine is checked but still happen like that.
That's the problem, If you see in Inventrans, the qty is splitting 80/20.
Any idea?
Thanks,
Yuliana
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sundarara
Hi Yulina..
Actually it should be checked..
Once we got the same problem when we left the checkbox unchecked.
The functionality of that particular check box is if we leave it
unchecked then any amendments that we made to the purchase qty it
will create a new transaction line instead
Hi Jens,
Yes I'm really sure not the marking problem
I've checked in Inv marking Menu and Reference field.
Thanks,
Yuliana
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jens
Strandberg
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 4:18 PM
T
Hi Sundar,
Yes, it is checked.
What is this parameter used for? And what is the effect if we ticked this
Parameter.
Thanks
Yuliana
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sundararajan.T - Software Engineer (Enterprise So
Hi Just check whether Automatic addiction check box in Inventory
parameters in Checked..
Regards
Sundar
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tany,
Yuliana
Sent: Wednesday, April 26, 2006 9:39 AM
To: 'Axapta-Knowledge-Vill
Tany, James,
Are you absolutely sure, that marking is not attached ?
Please check from sales line / purch line form , button Stock/Invent, menu
item Marking...
Our users in one of our companies are actually using marking without even
knowing. This happens, if you create a sales order line and
Yeah I have managed to stick bits of it back together but it will never
be the same again!!!
I hear V4.0 will have some changes to the costing (at least for avg) so just
when I thought that maybe I had most of it covered now its back to square
oneI am just wondering how much more I ca
Hi Harry thanks for your reply. Yes basically I think the same way
(using dummy item), that is solving one part of creating prod orders
as well as resource scheduling.
>From the procedural point of view I need to have a inventory journal
template which is basically consists of "reverse BOM" l
Yup, I've checked in Field Reference, no marking :)
James, your head is already broken and rolling on the floor because of the
Inventory Closing Problem?
Same...
Haha, I think everyone has a same problem :)
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[E
Okay...
Not using marking does not mean you might not have data with...be a little
careful and check the field I mentioned on the trans giving you
problems...one customer I had was sure they were not using marking but when
we looked in there was marking everywhere (it came from master planning
Haha okay...too late for me then me head is already broken and rolling on
the floor... ;)
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rajagopal.B
Sent: 21 April 2006 16:12
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Subject:
hurraaay..
thanks mam...
its working..
thank you..
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
otherwise, try to change the record value
salesline.reservation=itemreservation::automatic;
gopala krishna
To: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ax
Hi James,
Thanks for the quick reply.
No we don't use marking.
Split qty during On hand revaluation sounds make sense, but I'm not sure
this is the problem. I will check in detail.
Thanks,
Yuliana
-Original Message-
From: Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PRO
Check do you have any marking on the items that came back to MH from the
Quarantine warehosue.
Check on the inventrans that are split, genreral tabpage field ReferenceLot
has a value?.
Other times inventtrans can be split is during onhand revaluation.
If you have a trans that is 100 but only 80
otherwise, try to change the record value
salesline.reservation=itemreservation::automatic;
gopala krishna
in which method, u write this code?
gopala krishna
its not working .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
try this one.
salesline_combo.setEditText(enum2str(itemreservation::automatic));
regs,
Hema. S
gopala krishna
To: axapta-knowledge-village@yahoogroups.com
Sent by: cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Axapta-Knowledge-Village] combobox.s
32 matches
Mail list logo
