Russell wrote:
... We are engaged in a debate in whether or not to implement the
system allowing inventory to go negative. I am not a fan of this
setup.
Does anyone have any thoughts of whether this is advisable, or
under what conditions this should be considered?
I would agree that
We are trying to generate a report for our users that provides
details on the vendor invoice detail behind the charges to their
ledger accounts. But we are finding that many of the lines on the
vendor invoice trans table and purchase line table do not have ledger
accounts. Apparently when
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, ppcheah70
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All
Need all your advice URGENLY.
Understand that in Axapta, when we generate a stock revaluation,
system only revalue on posted stock (stock that have been received
invoiced).
With Axapta
Our company is using Crystal reports for much of our reporting from
Axapta.
We did not find many of the standard Axapta reports very useful or
flexible.
In either case, you will need to understand the data structure to
develop new reports. But we felt Crystal was better suited to users
david bonk wrote:
... Axapta has to make this entry because the alternative is to put
an item into inventory at a cost different form standard and this
is not possible.
I partially agree - but to me the alternative is to record the
negative cogs at the current standard, not the old
Some of our more zealous users deleted some purchase orders that had
open packing slips on them. Is there a way within Axapta to restore
purchase orders from the voided order table back to the open order
table?
Thanks,
Bruce
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
.
Bruce
--- In Axapta-Knowledge-Village@yahoogroups.com, Subrahmanyam Mamidi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Are you able to delete PO when its in received status?.
Or can you give us more details about the situation?.
Thanks ,
Subbu
frodnew57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some of our more
We have subscription orders with many of our vendors, but wish to
have them expire at the end of the year and be replaced with new
subscription orders. Unfortunately, the old subscription orders
still appear as open. This invites transactions being posted to the
wrong order. We would like
this is clear.
Bruce
HI Bruce,
I have added few extra dimensions and did some validations on those.
Can you be more specific about the issue so that I will try to help
you.
thanks,
Subbu
frodnew57 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else found that it would be helpful if the list
RAL/James,
Thanks for the responses. That is just the information I was
looking for.
Bruce
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
$9.95 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/J8kdrA/y20IAA/yQLSAA/kGEolB/TM
We are struggling with two issues related to credit memos and are
wondering how others have approached these issues.
1. We want to generate monthly reports of credit memos summarized by
return action code. But the only place we can find the return
action code is on the sales line table.
We recently converted from 2.5 to 3.0. It was a complete re-install,
not an upgrade. One of the items we didn't consider was how the
check reconciliation process would work after the implementation.
Obviously we still have checks outstanding that were written in 2.5
that do not appear in
Here is the dilemna. We can (using posting profiles) assign
different vendors to different accounts payable accounts.
But we have two bank accounts that are used to pay vendors. And each
vendor gets paid from only one of the two bank accounts. Is there a
way to assign each vendor to a
Is anyone aware of a good write up describing the functionality and
interaction of the following Axapta credit functions?
1. Customer File - Mandatory Credit Check (this switch does not
appear to affect how the system works)
2. Customer File - Credit Limit (This is fairly self-explanatory)
3.
14 matches
Mail list logo
