[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i am trying to avoid 1.2 million lines of javascript with browser
> dependent ifdefs. we already have that problem with C. instead of
> trying to work "on top" of the browser, which limits our abilities
> to the current available set, i'm trying to think
i'm currently working on making the ISSAC Proceeding CD so i can't
check out your references at the moment but i will as soon as i can.
i did want to respond to your comment that you didn't think discussion
was useful and that we need running code
i think the focus on running code is great a
--- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On June 20, 2005 7:35 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> > we're trying to build a research science platform, not a
> > display GUI object. we'd like the GUI piece of the system to
> > have a clean, programmable semantics so we can reason about
> > user actions. we w
we're debating, not disagreeing. although you're clearly wrong :-)
i agree standards are a *good thing*(TM) but standards come after practice,
not before. when they come before practice they are generally large,
expensive, and overbuilt (e.g. XML)
i agree that browsers are a good thing. they are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> * the DOM model is not really math-aware
It doesn't have to be. All it needs to have is nodes that contain
expressions, figures, or input. It is totally appropriate to
encapsulate these. The DOM is for the presentation end, not
calculation.
> * th
On June 20, 2005 7:35 PM Tim Daly wrote:
> ...
> some sort of browser-like capabilities are assumed.
Yes, most certainly. As usual, I find I agree with many things
you say below, but disagree strong on some specific points.
> the limitations we have now seems to be things like:
>
> * the syntax
taking this discussion away from the short term summer of code
so we can think about the bigger issues.
in the long term (the 30 year horizon) it seems clear that some
sort of browser-like capabilities are assumed. the limitations we
have now seems to be things like:
* the syntax of the web
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/FrontPage/diff
--
Dear Unknown,
(You should set preferences to identify yourself.)
> Anyone knows what's up?
I don't know what was causing the problem exactly.
But the last comment posted to AxiomProblems definitely
was causing the server t
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/AxiomProblems/diff
--
This problem has been documented as #178 Linear Agebra problem
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing
Changes
http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/178LinearAgebraProblem/diff
--
This doesn't work:
\begin{axiom}
L := [ A = 2*P1+P2, B = 2*P2+P1, C = 2*Q1+Q2, D = 2*Q2+Q1]
solve(L, [P1,P2])
\end{axiom}
But it should, observe this:
\begin{axiom}
SA:=solve([L.1,L.2],[P1,P2])
SB:=solve([L.3,L.
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/177ExpandCos2X/diff
--
expand (cos (x+y)) and expand (cos (x+y+z)) are right.
Is it possible to expand cos (2*x) = 2*cos(x)^2-1 or 1 - 2*sin(x)^2
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
__
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/FrontPage/diff
--
Few days ago I posted a problem to "Axiom problems" page. Since then, I cannot
enter that page to check what is the status of this problem! Anytime I try to
enter "Axiom problems" page, the server seems to hangup (at least
Ralf,
The message
The root module <<*>> was not defined
just means that there was no code in the file.
I'll fix it.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Changes
http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/176FactoredPolynomialsArentDifferentiatedCorrectly/diff
--
\begin{axiom}
p := -x*y^2+x*y+x^3-x^2
D(factor(p),x)
D(p,x)
\end{axiom}
Note that the factorization is correct. It's the D(.,x) that misses the sign.
--
forwarded from http://page.ax
Changes
http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/176FactoredPolynomialsArentDifferentiatedCorrectly/diff
--
Category: Axiom Compiler => Axiom Mathematics
Severity: normal => serious
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There seems to be a little error in the documentation (see below)
I hope that does not turn into some missing documentation somewhere.
I found this by accident and wondered why the compilation process did
not stop when there is obviously something not as it should be.
Ralf
--- snip ---
1 makin
In axiom you need to use records:
foo(a: Integer, b: Integer): Record(s: String, r:Integer) == ("sum", a+b);
Oh, interesting. I would have thought that your line gives a syntax
error. At least according to the axiom book pp 141 (Section 2.4) one
should write
foo(a:Integer,b:Integer):Record(
Ralf Hemmecke writes:
> > > (7) I tried using a list to return multiple variables from a
> > > function. However, this turns out to be of type any. These variables
> > > can be displayed but not used in operations any further. This means
> > > that you have to remember the types of each va
> (7) I tried using a list to return multiple variables from a
> function. However, this turns out to be of type any. These variables can be
> displayed but not used in operations any further. This means that you have
> to remember the types of each variable in the list. Then, manually in the
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/AxiomLibrary/diff
--
college algebra
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.no
20 matches
Mail list logo
