Dear Bill, Martin, William, and other... thanks a lot !
Yesterday I finish a first version of expand sin_cos,
expand sinh_cosh, expand tan_tanh, ...
Now I will improve it thanks to your previous reponses.
And I have theses other questions. This time every one is very short :
1/ what is the <<
Hi all.
> Why don't you use tla?
See the section "Criticisms" on:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Arch
and then the amount of work going on at:
http://arch.sv.gnu.org/archives/gnu-arch/
Cheers
Mike Thomas.
___
Axiom-developer mailing li
--- Start of forwarded message ---
Subject: GCL patch for Fedora Core 5
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=E9rard?= Milmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-0BwGir19qmPpuYENcGhB"
Organization: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Univers
Greetings! Could someone please point these out to me?
Take care,
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thanks for the FC5 patches.
> I'll download and build FC5, create an axiom FC5 makefile change,
> and test it. --t
>
>
> ___
> Axiom-developer mai
Hi Greg,
I compiled axiom--main--1--patch-47.
Output comes below. I hope that helps...
My Axiom does not crash on that.
Ralf
woodpecker:~>axiom
AXIOM Computer Algebra System
Version: Axiom (December 2005)
Timestamp: Monday March 13
forwarded 349877 axiom-developer@nongnu.org
thanks
Greetings, and thanks for your report! Forwarding to axiom upstream.
Take care,
Jiří Paleček <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> X-Debbugs-CC: Jiri Palecek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Package: axiom
> Version: 20050901-4
> Severity: normal
>
> When I en
Hi Ralf,
I know that you have recently compiled Axiom and i want to know if you
can execute these commands in an Axiom interpreter and give me the
output. I'm working on issue #196 ( )set functions compile on )
-- beware axiom can crash
)set func comp off
f(xl: LIST FRAC INT): LIST FRAC INT == m
Ralf,
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006 8:29 AM you wrote:
> ...
> I also volunteer to write the documentation on the wiki
> related to this tla stuff. Once one understands the basic
> things, it becomes easy. But I wanted to commit to a local
> archive (without internet access) and then merge with th
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006 11:49 AM I wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:48 PM Francois Maltey wrote:
> >
> > In the interpreter I have this single line :
> >
> > fct (n, x) == eval (real ((c + %i * s)^n), [c, s], [cos x, sin x])
> >
> > I want to add this function in manip.spad... :-(
>
On Tuesday, March 21, 2006 3:48 PM Francois Maltey wrote:
>
> In the interpreter I have this single line :
>
> fct (n, x) == eval (real ((c + %i * s)^n), [c, s], [cos x, sin x])
>
> I want to add this function in manip.spad... :-(
> ...
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:22 AM Martin Rubey wrote:
>
Thanks for the FC5 patches.
I'll download and build FC5, create an axiom FC5 makefile change,
and test it. --t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > On 03/28/2006 08:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
| > > I believe that the following procedure for patches would be a *lot*
better:
| > > * if necessary, open an issue in IssueTracker
| > > * upload the patch to
Le lundi 27 mars 2006 à 22:35 -0500, Page, Bill a écrit :
[...]
> What is a "sequence"? As far as I know this is not defined in
> Axiom. Do mean that some types should be automatically coercible
> to type List? Note that:
>
> V:=vector [1,2,3]
> [i for i in V::List Integer]
>
> works in the
On 03/28/2006 01:15 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Why don't you use tla?
Make a new branch from axiom--main--1, hack at the new branch and if it is
finished, tell Tim that there is something new available ready for merge. Tim
then could investigate that branc
On 03/28/2006 01:15 PM, Page, Bill wrote:
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:40 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
Why don't you use tla?
Make a new branch from axiom--main--1, hack at the new branch
and if it is finished, tell Tim that there is something new
available ready for merge. Tim then could investig
Dear Francois,
I'd propose
)abbrev package TEST Test
Test(): Exports == Implementation where
EXPR ==> Expression Integer
CEXPR ==> Complex EXPR
Exports == with
fct: (Integer, EXPR) -> EXPR
Implementation == add
fct(n, x) ==
vc := 'c::Symbol::EXPR
vs := 's::
On Tuesday, March 28, 2006 5:40 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> ...
> Why don't you use tla?
>
> Make a new branch from axiom--main--1, hack at the new branch
> and if it is finished, tell Tim that there is something new
> available ready for merge. Tim then could investigate that
> branch, test and c
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 03/28/2006 08:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
> > I believe that the following procedure for patches would be a *lot* better:
> > * if necessary, open an issue in IssueTracker
> > * upload the patch to MathAction
> > This automatically sends a mail to axio
On 03/28/2006 08:57 AM, Martin Rubey wrote:
I believe that the following procedure for patches would be a *lot* better:
* if necessary, open an issue in IssueTracker
* upload the patch to MathAction
This automatically sends a mail to axiom-developer. In case you want to make
sure, you can addi
First, there is a difference of Axiom and Aldor here.
If you say
a::B
than that means EXACTLY the same as
coerce(a)@B
Aldor treats :: as syntactic sugar and nothing more.
That also says if you have a function
convert: A -> B
but no function
coerce: A -> B
then the Aldor compiler
20 matches
Mail list logo
