On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Page, Bill wrote:
| That is was not automatically built is a bug.
it is a dependency working assumption I made. It will be lifted -- it
is on the TODO list.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
htt
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, root wrote:
| do you require a specific version or can i use the one in zips?
You can use the one in the zips (just way --without-gcl) -- though I
also build with GCL-2.6.7
If you have GCL installed, configure will detect it and use it.
| i'm trying not to make assumptions
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:17 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> yum install noweb failed.
> where should i get the recommended noweb?
>
What's wrong with your installation of yum?
Or do you mean that noweb is not in the yum archive?
'apt-get install noweb' works fine on Debian.
Regards,
Bill Page
Tim,
>
> do you require a specific version or can i use the one in
> zips? i'm trying not to make assumptions so i can do a valid
> test of your makefiles.
>
Noweb's master distribution is here:
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/nr/noweb/dist
You can use that if you want. The executables have to be
do you require a specific version or can i use the one in zips?
i'm trying not to make assumptions so i can do a valid test of
your makefiles.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axio
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, root wrote:
| yum install noweb failed.
I'm puzzled.
| where should i get the recommended noweb?
I took that of Norman Ramsey.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/
yum install noweb failed.
where should i get the recommended noweb?
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, root wrote:
| checking for notangle... no
| checking for noweave... no
[...]
| make[3]: Entering directory `/home/arch/bi/src'
| cd . && notangle -t8 Makefile.pamphlet > ./Makefile.in
| /bin/sh: notangle: command not found
| make[3]: *** [Makefile.in] Error 127
| make[3]: Le
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bi]$ ./configure
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux
checking target system type... i686-pc-linux
checking for gcc... gcc
checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out
checking whether the C compiler works... yes
check
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, root wrote:
| Gaby,
|
| Be sure you test your build on Fedora Core 5.
| I had to special case that platform.
yes, testing on as many as supported platforms is a prerequisite for
merge to silver. At this point, I'm still working on an experimental
branch. I would like to mo
Gaby,
Be sure you test your build on Fedora Core 5.
I had to special case that platform.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
this is a low hanging fruit toward simplification of the makefiles.
None of the following variables are needed in Makefile.${SYS}.
Tested on an x86_64-suse-linux
-- Gaby
2006-09-12 Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* Makefile.pamphlet (CC): Remove explicit setting throughout.
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| svn is more of a pig for storage than arch.
ys, SVN is space hungry. That is one of the main reason why I use SVK
-- it has a better file-sharing algorithms (plus other goodies). But
SVK works over SVN.
[...]
| So I would suggest that you ask
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Camm Maguire wrote:
[...]
| > I have built the build-improvements branch on the axiom-developer
| > server (in fact that is what is running on MathAction right now).
| > But I think the build process still has some problems. For example,
| > I am not able to build (even if I
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Page, Bill wrote:
| Gaby,
|
| On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 I wrote:
| > |
| > | I don't have access to a mac right now, but I can confirm
| > | that the following commands build Axiom just fine on
| > | axiom-developer.org with both noweb and gcl pre-installed.
| >
|
| Here is another
Alfredo,
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 6:48 PM you asked:
> Trying to commit the Silver source to the Google repository,
> I had the problem of going over the disk quota limit. (100 MB).
>
> I email google and they asking me what size we need.
>
>If you can advise me on what size
"Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Higuer powers :-) (Bill, Tim, Gaby, Ralf...),
|
| Trying to commit the Silver source to the Google repository, I had the
| problem
| of going over the disk quota limit. (100 MB).
|
| I email google and they asking me what size we need.
|
| If you c
"Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Higuer powers :-) (Bill, Tim, Gaby, Ralf...),
|
| Trying to commit the Silver source to the Google repository, I had the
| problem
| of going over the disk quota limit. (100 MB).
Hey, they must be kidding... :-)
full source of Axiom silver is about
Higuer powers :-) (Bill, Tim, Gaby, Ralf...),Trying to commit the Silver source to the Google repository, I had the problemof going over the disk quota limit. (100 MB).I email google and they asking me what size we need.
If you can advise me on what size would be good?
Regards,Alfrdo Portes
__
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 3:49 PM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> i'm not behind a proxy.
> i'm hardwired to the net.
>
Me too, baby. :)) And proxies are hardwired too. ((:
Whether you connect via a proxy or not can be quite transparent
to you - they hide everywhere these days: inside NAT routers,
in
Gaby,
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 I wrote:
> |
> | I don't have access to a mac right now, but I can confirm
> | that the following commands build Axiom just fine on
> | axiom-developer.org with both noweb and gcl pre-installed.
>
Here is another report:
I have successfully built the Axiom Silver build.
i'm not behind a proxy.
i'm hardwired to the net.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Tim,
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 11:36 AM you wrote:
>
> i set out to fix the silver version.
> so far i tried 8 checkouts without success
> and now i'm up to 20 updates, slowly grabbing pieces.
> SVN on sourceforge seems broken somehow.
>
It is possible that you are using a proxy that does
Ralf,
On Tuesday, September 12, 2006 12:05 PM you wrote:
>
> Why cannot we first agree on how to fix it. Just removing the
> SVN properties (svn:eol-style and svn:keywords) is probably
> NOT enough.
>
Agreed.
> I have given a short procedure that should do the work
> without much trouble.
>
Greetings!
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gaby,
>
> On Monday, September 11, 2006 12:26 PM you wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, root wrote:
> >
> > | > The error from the configure is this:
> > | > ***
> > | > Darwin
> > | > Your system n
Why cannot we first agree on how to fix it. Just removing the SVN
properties (svn:eol-style and svn:keywords) is probably NOT enough.
I have given a short procedure that should do the work without much trouble.
>>So basically, the procedure would be.
>>1) Remove the svn:keywords property from
i set out to fix the silver version.
so far i tried 8 checkouts without success
and now i'm up to 20 updates, slowly grabbing pieces.
SVN on sourceforge seems broken somehow.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.no
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> ...
> 1. I think a default GUI for Axiom would be a Very Good Thing
>>>
>>>Kai Kaminski wrote:
As I said, I'm not convinced.
>
> I am convinced that trying to build a graphical user interface that
> works only
SVN checkin...
in a clean Axiom (no CVS, .arch-ids, .svn directories, etc) do:
cd ~/axiom/..
ls -lR axiom >foo
(edit foo to change each line to read svn add filename)
(edit foo to set the binary information for binary files)
sh ./foo
cd axiom
svn commit -m"first commit"
this should work. it'
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| First of all, there was not proper response to my suggestion
|
| http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00138.html
|
| of how to deal with the "binary" file problem that we have in the
| sourceforge repository. I think we shoul
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006, Page, Bill wrote:
| On Monday, September 11, 2006 11:23 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > I've long errouneously blamed GCL. Detailed investigation turned
| > out top be an Axiom doing. Fixed thusly.
| >
| > Tested on:
| >
| > * i686-pc-linux with GCL and noweb installed
First of all, there was not proper response to my suggestion
http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2006-09/msg00138.html
of how to deal with the "binary" file problem that we have in the
sourceforge repository. I think we should solve that BEFORE the data is
moved to google code
Dear Alfredo,
"Alfredo Portes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sorry Martin, the latest version of the LiveCD uses Fedora, because it was
> the final goal to use Redhat software. I have not had time to try to put
> MathAction on a Knoppix CD. I guess I should look into this. :(
>
> Have you u
A followup on my own post, containing some material for fast algorithms.
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I need an operation evalADE that takes a functional equation of the form
>
> f(x) = g(f(x), D(f(x),x), D(f(x),x,2),...),
>
> where g is any "nice" expression, some initial values
Hi Martin,On 12 Sep 2006 08:46:32 +0200, Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Alfredo, Bill,as you probably know, I'm going to present my guessing package next week - onlyas a poster, unfortunately, but still.I would like to be able to give away Live-CD's (Knoppix style) that contain
Axiom
35 matches
Mail list logo