"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Here is a patch to Rosetta.pamphlet to make it a real pamphlet
| (noweb) file:
This looks OK to me. Tim?
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/l
> The filter from the FAQ does not work. I had to use:
>
> noweave -filter 'sed "/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /s/_/_/g;/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> /s/_/_/g"'
>
> (apstrophes inside filter interacted with quoting inside noweave).
Urk! At some point I must have changed noweave without changing the
On October 22, 2006 9:30 PM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> ...
> Inspired by noweb FAQ in am testing the following patch --
> tohether with previous patch it allowed me to run 'make dvi'
> with only two problems (Rosetta.pamphlet and more-rules.mk).
> 'more-rules.mk' is build only during main build, so f
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The filter from the FAQ does not work. I had to use:
|
| noweave -filter 'sed "/[EMAIL PROTECTED] /s/_/_/g;/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/s/_/_/g"'
|
| (apstrophes inside filter interacted with quoting inside noweave).
I'm in the process of "trimming o
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | There are more problems: apparently noweb can not correctly handle
> | files which have underscores in their names. For example latex run
> | on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the following errors (I removed
> | other messag
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I needed the patch below to run latex (make dvi) on build-improvements.
| This patch does NOT correct the following problems:
| 1) mangled latex file
| - src/doc/Rosetta.pamphlet
| 2) unescaped underscores
| - src/hyper/parse_aux.pamphlet
|
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Shows that Gaby made the change to include the underscore _
| on 2006-09-18.
Yes, that is correct.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/li
Bill Page wrote:
> Thanks, Norman. I think we figured it out. There is really no
> mangling - just an "innocent" change with unexpected behaviour.
> Your FAQ is very useful:
>
> http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/nr/noweb/FAQ.html
>
> Q. How do I get an output file (root chunk) with an underscore
> in
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Could this be a LOCALE/LANG issue?
No. It is an issue on build-improvements while back when I made a
uniform rule to extracting the C files from the pamphlets.
| Or is this behaviour specific
| to the version of noweb distributed by Debian?
No, it is a
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
| > > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > >
| > > | ii nowebm 2.10c-3.3 A WEB-like
| > > | literate-programming tool
| > >
| > ...
| > There are more problems: apparently no
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| There are more problems: apparently noweb can not correctly handle
| files which have underscores in their names. For example latex run
| on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the following errors (I removed
| other messages which are caused by the two error
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| the essense of literate programming can be done without noweb.
I'm glad to hear that; because it was not obvious to me people agreed
when I suggested similar ideas in different terms some months ago.
-- Gaby
___
Thanks, Norman. I think we figured it out. There is really no
mangling - just an "innocent" change with unexpected behaviour.
Your FAQ is very useful:
http://www.eecs.harvard.edu/nr/noweb/FAQ.html
Q. How do I get an output file (root chunk) with an underscore
in its name? LaTeX complains about
> I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
>
> Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
> the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
Sounds like you guys have a local hack.
The underscore issue is a FAQ.
Norman
>
> > -Original Message-
On 10/22/2006 07:31 PM, root wrote:
Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
...
* latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
\begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public.
Can
On October 22, 2006 2:10 PM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> ...
> Correction: both verion of noweb give the same result. The real
> reason is that parse_aux.pamphlet in build-improvements is modified:
>
> --- ../../silver/axiom/src/hyper/parse_aux.pamphlet
> 2006-10-20 23:54:15.0 +0200
> +++
I needed the patch below to run latex (make dvi) on build-improvements.
This patch does NOT correct the following problems:
1) mangled latex file
- src/doc/Rosetta.pamphlet
2) unescaped underscores
- src/hyper/parse_aux.pamphlet
- src/hyper/parse_paste.pamphlet
- src/hyper/parse
Bill Page wrote:
> I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
>
> Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
> the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Waldek Hebisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Ax
> > Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
> > requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
> ...
> > * latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
> > \begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public.
>
> Can one infer that th
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
...
> Although noweb implements three of four features I don't see it as a
> requirement. Indeed there has been discussion of other formats such as
...
> * latex macro forms which replace the <<>> syntax with
> \begin{chunk}{chunkname}, not yet public
I think we should ask Norman Ramsey about this "name mangling".
Does it have a nice solution that would allow us to use
the version(s) of noweb distributed by Debian?
> -Original Message-
> From: Waldek Hebisch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: October 22, 2006 11:01 AM
> To: Bill Page
>
On October 22, 2006 9:15 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> Tim Daly wrote:
> > So if straight latex is the base case of a valid literate
> > pamphlet file (since it contains 0 lines of code) then we
> > have a working definition.
>
> Cool, I have never read this somewhere before. ;-)
>
Yes, one might h
Bill Page wrote:
> On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> >
> > For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> > following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> > the two errors):
> >
> > ! Missing $ inserted.
> >
> > $
> > l.13 ...aux.pa
On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>
> For example latex run on src/hyper/parse_aux.tex gives the
> following errors (I removedother messages which are caused by
> the two errors):
>
> ! Missing $ inserted.
>
> $
> l.13 ...aux.pamphlet}\nwbegincode{1}\moddef{parse_
On October 22, 2006 9:39 AM Waldek Hebisch wrote:
> > Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > | ii nowebm 2.10c-3.3 A WEB-like
> > | literate-programming tool
> >
> ...
> There are more problems: apparently noweb can not correctly
> handle files which have underscor
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Gaby, you probably know this, but just in case: running
> | Rosetta.pamphlet trough noweb messes it. This is using
> | Debian noweb. Package identification:
> |
> | ii nowebm 2.10c-3.3 A WEB-like literate-pr
So if straight latex is the base case of a valid literate pamphlet file
(since it contains 0 lines of code) then we have a working definition.
Cool, I have never read this somewhere before. ;-)
There are many ways to implement that definition, maybe use the latex
command directly or fix noweb
27 matches
Mail list logo
