On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Bill Page wrote:
| On 08 Aug 2007 01:50:45 +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
| > ...
| > I recall describing on the list how to work around it by making the build
| > process semi-automatic, i.e., adding only the files in the first layer
(i.e.,
| > RECOP, FAMR2, GOPT, etc.) to src/a
On Tue, 8 Aug 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
| Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > On Tue, 8 Aug 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
| >
| > | Do you recall what went wrong at ISSAC?
| >
| > Many things :-)
| >
| > More specifically:
| >
| > * short hand for unnamed functions do not work pro
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> | Do you recall what went wrong at ISSAC?
>
> Many things :-)
>
> More specifically:
>
> * short hand for unnamed functions do not work properly, so one has
>to use the syntax x +-> f(x)
Could you
On 08 Aug 2007 01:50:45 +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> ...
> I recall describing on the list how to work around it by making the build
> process semi-automatic, i.e., adding only the files in the first layer (i.e.,
> RECOP, FAMR2, GOPT, etc.) to src/algebra/Makefile.pamphlet, finishing the
> build,
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Bill Page wrote:
[...]
| During the build there are unexpected errors during the compile of
| some modules, even when they are compiled in the required order. Tim
| demonstrated to me that if he stopped the build at that point and
| started Axiom normally, the )compile command
On Tue, 8 Aug 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
| Do you recall what went wrong at ISSAC?
Many things :-)
More specifically:
* short hand for unnamed functions do not work properly, so one has
to use the syntax x +-> f(x)
* the most recalcitrant was a package call to generalInterpolation()
fro
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It is a similar problem but Franz' problem is even more difficult
> because it attempts to make a basic change to some existing algebra
> code deep down in the algebra hierachy. In this case the initial
> databases that are in the share directory of the bu
On 08 Aug 2007 01:50:45 +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Bill Page writes:
> ...
> > This is the same problem that was originally reported by Alfredo
> > Portes about this time last year.
>
> Yes. I recall describing on the list how to work around it by making the
> build
> process semi-automatic, i.
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This works just as you describe - even with Gold.
great!
> But the problem occurred when Tim tried to add the necessary commands to the
> algebra/Makefile.pamphlet file to include the GUESS package in the standard
> build. This is the same problem that
On 08 Aug 2007 01:09:38 +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > At ISSAC'07, Tim, Bill, Stephen W., Barry and I (and probably others) tried
> > to get your algebra compile.
>
> Oops. Well, from a running axiom system, you should compile things for
> example
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm not sure how Martin plans to garner 49 votes for anything but
> that's his problem to solve. I say 49 votes because there are 97
> people registered on the mailing list. Every "democratic" process
> I'm aware of requires at least a simple majority to "pass". If an
"Andrey G. Grozin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course, this requires some programming, but quite trivial - LaTeX syntax
> is very simple and regular (unless we play dirty low-level TeX games with
> re-defining character classes, etc.; such tricks should be certainly banned
> in pamphlet file
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Please post a working pamphlet file (English is preferred),
> |
> | I definitively do not have time to do that now.
>
> Martin --
>
>I hope you had good time.
Partially, thanks...
>I beli
On 07 Aug 2007 17:34:36 -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | > Please post a working pamphlet file (English is preferred),
> |
> | I definitively do not have time to do that now.
>
> Martin --
>
>I hope you had good time.
>
>I believe an English ex
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| | If you need more information, just ask.
| |
| | BTW, /home/hemmecke/config/emacs is actually supposed to be my .emacs
| | file, but in fact it is unused. I have no idea why the build machinary
| | wants to write anything outside /home/hemmec
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Please post a working pamphlet file (English is preferred),
|
| I definitively do not have time to do that now.
Martin --
I hope you had good time.
I believe an English explanation of what you're doing will be helpful.
At ISSAC'07, Tim, Bill,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Martin,
>
> Normally I wouldn't mention this as an on-list post but
??? WHY ???
> I spent the last two weeks rearranging Axiom so people can add
> algebra code to the system.
Great.
> I started adding your algebra to the system. I ran into a problem.
> It appea
On Tue, 7 Aug 2007, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
| gcl/config.log and gcl/elisp/Makefile are attached.
|
| It seems that I am missing some library, right?
Thanks!
I believe GCL's configure tested to see where it could install
Emacs .el files. The test did not succeed, but for some reasons
the variable
Stephen,
Patch accepted and applied.
I've put it in the queue for a test cycle.
If it passes the tests I'll promote it.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Ralf,
It appears that sshd is not running on parrot.risc.uni-linz.ac.at
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Hi Gaby,
|
| I am unlucky for some reason.
|
| woodpecker:~/SVK/axiom/branches/build-improvements>svk info
| Checkout Path: /home/hemmecke/SVK/axiom/branches/build-improvements
| Depot Path: /mirror/axiom/branches/build-improvements
| Revision: 779
| L
Greetings, and thanks!
If you have the failing binary with a set of reproducible triggering
commands, that still could be useful even if compiled without
debugging. (si::nani address) where address is the hex number printed
in the FREE OBJECT error output will give you the object in question
if y
Hi Gaby,
I am unlucky for some reason.
woodpecker:~/SVK/axiom/branches/build-improvements>svk info
Checkout Path: /home/hemmecke/SVK/axiom/branches/build-improvements
Depot Path: /mirror/axiom/branches/build-improvements
Revision: 779
Last Changed Rev.: 779
Mirrored From: https://axiom.svn.sourc
23 matches
Mail list logo
