that mostly concerned how to handle the situation of Aldor
not being released.
Any updates available or forthcoming on that subject?
Cheers,
CY
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
> My Axiom talk:
>
> - http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage_days2_audio/VOICE014.MP3
>
> If you listen, please comment! :-)
Um, file not found. Is this it?
http://sage.math.washington.edu/sage_days2_audio/Bill_Page.mp3
Downloading that to
On Monday 16 October 2006 20:05, Alejandro Jakubi wrote:
> Tim, Alfredo, CY
> > One doesn't always want to achieve that. The first question to be asked
> > should be "is this new behavior wrong, or was the old behavior wrong?"
> > (In more subtle cases -
k inside
one larger, robust, and powerful framework? Then each new algorithm and tool
would be immediately available for use in any new work.
Axiom's design gives me hope for this goal - it appears to be designed
generally enough that it can scale. But there are many years of work ahead
to make it a well documented and robust system.
Cheers,
CY
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
aps it would be worth looking at it again.
Cheers,
CY
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
I could be wrong of course, but at the moment poor Tim seems to be in the
position of being the keystone and most of the arch as well. He's one of a
VERY few people with a hope of decoding this as is, especially issues like
optimization. Is there any way the rest of us could do someth
