On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 13:29 +0100, Weiss, Juergen wrote:
...
> > Hahaha! :) You did a CMUCL port 2 years ago? In 1/2 a day? Nice. :)
>
> Did not say that. With the changes I made and the link to the
> sources I posted 2 years ago, it should not take longer than
> 1/2 a day to incorportate the c
On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 10:20 +0100, Weiss, Juergen wrote:
> Actually the changes are minor, if you forget about
> changes in style. There is the changed package syntax.
> And there is the quoted function stuff and some minor
> changes (a few macros and one or two places in the algebra
> code) for s
> Really, I don't want to play with any of this.
It shows.
> I want to use
> computer algebra for theoretical physics. I would prefer if
> heavy lifting was done in a collaborative manner, shared among
> several people. But instead, the suggestion is that I should
> start by studying a textbook
On Wed, 2005-11-16 at 02:11 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Is Maxima compiled on GCL as a Common Lisp application?
I don't know. It is possible to compile Maxima on a Common Lisp, but I
don't think that GCL is a complete Common Lisp implementation yet. I
think Raymond Toy was responsible for
preferred although from what I hear Araneida is supposed to be
> pretty good. Is any other reason why Tim Daly Jr. recommends an
> Apache solution?
I don't know exactly what you guys are doing, being CC'd in the middle
of this and all, but I wouldn't think about performance until
