On 17/11/13 18:28, d...@axiom-developer.org wrote:
This is interesting. I'm trying to incorporate it into the
new Axiom browser-based front end. However, anyone doing
literate programs in mathematics will find it useful.
http://latex2html5.com
Tim,
Yes it does look interesting. Looking at th
This is interesting. I'm trying to incorporate it into the
new Axiom browser-based front end. However, anyone doing
literate programs in mathematics will find it useful.
http://latex2html5.com
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongn
Bill, Cliff, Ralf,
I wasn't suggesting that the domain and functions be only implemented
in spad. I was suggesting that the interface be well specified so it
could be implemented in a compatible way in lisp/spad/aldor/perl/whatever.
That would mean that the access and algorithms would be independe
On May 4, 2007 10:48 AM Tim Daly wrote:
>
> I'd suggest we think about pamphlets as a domain and think
> about what operations make sense in the domain.
>
> I'd suggest we move up a level in the design. We need a
> couple tools with crisp definitions. This would allow us
> to decompose and recomp
Cliff, Ralf,
I'd suggest we think about pamphlets as a domain and think about what
operations make sense in the domain.
I'd suggest we move up a level in the design. We need a couple tools
with crisp definitions. This would allow us to decompose and recompose
a pamphlet file. Then we can use thes
Cliff,
I expect that if we use the booklet URL syntax that it would
be within the clweb machinery, not in C. If Axiom serves pages
to a firefox front end it would be easy to turn the embedded
URLs into web pages.
Tim
___
Axiom-developer mailing lis
Cliff,
The only two noweb tools I've used are the chunking mechanism and the
[[]] quoting mechanism. And I've started rewriting the [[]] quoting
mechanism out of material, both new and old.
I debated, coded and removed other facilities in gclweb (you can still
see remnants of code in the preline
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > So, I suspect we have to make a list of people for whom either SF or
| > > Google SVN works and decide where we go from there.
| > >
| >
| > For me SF SVN works. I did only tiny commits and one of them failed
| > (I had to redo it), so I am not sure how wel
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| > So, I suspect we have to make a list of people for whom either SF or
| > Google SVN works and decide where we go from there.
| >
|
| For me SF SVN works. I did only tiny commits and one of them failed
| (I had to redo it),
> > So, I suspect we have to make a list of people for whom either SF or
> > Google SVN works and decide where we go from there.
> >
>
> For me SF SVN works. I did only tiny commits and one of them failed
> (I had to redo it), so I am not sure how well will scale. Getting
> sources was slow, but
Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> So, I suspect we have to make a list of people for whom either SF or
> Google SVN works and decide where we go from there.
>
For me SF SVN works. I did only tiny commits and one of them failed
(I had to redo it), so I am not sure how well will scale. Getting
sources was
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On October 24, 2006 3:33 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | Nevertheless, last week you thought about making your
| > | Gold-to-be public. We should have your tla branch and Silver
| > | on sourceforge
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > Axiom is the only project I know of that has more SCM than
| > active developers :-)
| >
|
| Hmmm... now who was that guy who insisted on adding svn to this
| mix in this first place? :-)
Touché.
Seriously, I must confess that with respect to
On October 24, 2006 3:33 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Nevertheless, last week you thought about making your
> | Gold-to-be public. We should have your tla branch and Silver
> | on sourceforge and google in sync. Everything else confuses
> | peopl
Tim,
On October 24, 2006 2:28 PM you asked:
>
> What is the state of SVN on axiom-developer?
SVN client version 1.4 and SVK both work fine. I still have
a problem installing SVN server because that requires a newer
version of Apache then we are currently running. I downloaded
and compiled a new
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I don't think that this is a problem with TEXINPUTS. \usepackage
| finally uses \include to get the file into memory. \input however,
| appends ".tex" by default.
|
| I think axiom.sty.tex should never be generated.
We need to latex the documentation i
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Nevertheless, last week you thought about making your Gold-to-be public.
| We should have your tla branch and Silver on sourceforge and google in
| sync. Everything else confuses people no matter how many SCM-systems
| we use for axiom.
Axiom is the onl
Bill,
What is the state of SVN on axiom-developer?
Do you feel it can be used?
If I try to update it with the changes what breaks?
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
On October 24, 2006 1:53 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> Nevertheless, last week you thought about making your Gold-to-be
> public. We should have your tla branch and Silver on sourceforge
> and google in sync. Everything else confuses people no matter how
> many SCM-systems we use for axiom.
>
I th
I don't think that this is a problem with TEXINPUTS. \usepackage finally
uses \include to get the file into memory. \input however, appends
".tex" by default.
I think axiom.sty.tex should never be generated. How did you get that
file anyway? Ah... I see that build-improvements/src/scripts/docu
Nevertheless, last week you thought about making your Gold-to-be public.
We should have your tla branch and Silver on sourceforge and google in
sync. Everything else confuses people no matter how many SCM-systems we
use for axiom.
Ralf
On 10/24/2006 05:20 PM, root wrote:
I guess that intenti
> Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | There is a problem running Latex in a directory where axiom.sty.tex
> | is present: Latex seeing '\usepackage{axiom}' picks 'axiom.sty.tex'
> | from current directory and bombs seeing duplicate '\documentclass'.
> |
> | This affects running Latex
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| There is a problem running Latex in a directory where axiom.sty.tex
| is present: Latex seeing '\usepackage{axiom}' picks 'axiom.sty.tex'
| from current directory and bombs seeing duplicate '\documentclass'.
|
| This affects running Latex in src/doc di
There is a problem running Latex in a directory where axiom.sty.tex
is present: Latex seeing '\usepackage{axiom}' picks 'axiom.sty.tex'
from current directory and bombs seeing duplicate '\documentclass'.
This affects running Latex in src/doc directory.
--
Waldek Heb
> >> I guess that intention here was to avoid hangs, but this does not
> >> work! To make '--interaction nonstopmode' effective one has to
> >> give it _before_ file name. So the form below is immune to hangs:
> >
> > ah, that's useful to know.
> >
> > fixed in the next release.
> >
> > t
>
>
On 10/24/2006 03:03 PM, root wrote:
I guess that intention here was to avoid hangs, but this does not
work! To make '--interaction nonstopmode' effective one has to
give it _before_ file name. So the form below is immune to hangs:
ah, that's useful to know.
fixed in the next release.
t
Coo
> I guess that intention here was to avoid hangs, but this does not
> work! To make '--interaction nonstopmode' effective one has to
> give it _before_ file name. So the form below is immune to hangs:
ah, that's useful to know.
fixed in the next release.
t
As I reported on some machines build (or just 'make dvi' on
build-improvement branch) hangs running latex. I have now tracked
the reasons. One is that on those machines there are missing
packeges (hyperref and/or pstricks). It would be nice to check
at configure time that necessary latex package
Motion on the sourceforge compile farm request
--- Start of forwarded message ---
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "SourceForge.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [ alexandria-Support Requests-1551244 ] Latex on Compile Farm
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2006 12:50:27 -0700
Support Requests item #155
--- Bill Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On September 17, 2006 11:17 PM C Y wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Tim. I added a comment to the RosettaStone page - I can't
> > seem to edit the page itself, perhaps because of the large number
> > of
> Yes, probably. We still have the pain caused by spam to d
On September 17, 2006 11:17 PM C Y wrote:
>
> Thanks Tim. I added a comment to the RosettaStone page - I can't
> seem to edit the page itself, perhaps because of the large number
> of
> Is anyone else seeing a problem with the formatting of the comments
> on the RosettaStone wiki page or is it
Thanks Tim. I added a comment to the RosettaStone page - I can't seem
to edit the page itself, perhaps because of the large number of wrote:
> > Is the LaTeX source code of this also available somewhere?
>
> src/doc/Rosetta.pamphlet
>
> t
>
>
_
> Is the LaTeX source code of this also available somewhere?
src/doc/Rosetta.pamphlet
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
We've got the Rosetta document up in html form at
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/RosettaStone
Is the LaTeX source code of this also available somewhere? If so, can
we add a link to it to the wiki page? I suppose in theory it would be
less current but it would be nice to have available. If the
> +%
> +% 2006-04-08. The original (correct) usepackage line below
> +%\usepackage[dvips,final,colorlinks=true,pdfstartview=FitH]{hyperref}
> +% has been changed to the following one in order to ease the
> +% compilation of axiom on distributions (like Debian sarge) that have
> +% an older versio
> I am just compiling patch-47 axiom on standard debian sarge.
>
> My compilation stops in the middle of compiling the documentation and
> just continues after I have pressed enter.
This is a symptom of a problem during latex processing.
Latex processing sends its output to a trace file called $
re: Final
> What do you happen to use? And why do you need that "final" anyway?
I didn't add the final keyword in the first place.
I believe it was sent to me while we were busy trying to demonstrate
the use of hyperlinking in graph structures. I'll remove it in the
next release.
t
__
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 10:44:36AM -0400, Bill Page wrote:
> Ralf,
> Good detective work! Thanks.
>
> > So in order to avoid problems for poor Debian users,
> > I would suggest to simply remove "final". I believe that
> > will not affect the output in any way.
> >
>
> I think you are rig
Ralf,
On April 7, 2006 10:34 AM you wrote:
> ...
> And the differences tell me that the newer version contains
> the following code that is not in 6.73n.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>\else
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>\fi
> }
As I told you before my (standard debian) hyperref.sty is
\ProvidesPackage{hyperref}
[2003/01/22 v6.73n
Hypertext links for LaTeX]
The one from http://www.tug.org/applications/hyperref/
says
\ProvidesPackage{hyperref}
[2003/11/30 v6.74m
Hypertext links for LaTeX]
And the differences te
Hi
On 04/07/2006 04:00 PM, Bill Page wrote:
That is strange. "final" is a standard option of the hyperref
package. See
http://www.tug.org/applications/hyperref/ftp/doc/manual.html
I actually also find it strange because remember, I've read about it.
3.1 General options
Firstly, the optio
On April 7, 2006 9:38 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
>
> To be honest, when I compiled axiom--main--1 I also realized that
> "pressing enter" did not help. I had to press "q".
>
> But strangely now a lot of "ENTER" helped.
>
> Tim still hasn't said why he needs the "final" in
> src/doc/endpaper.pamph
To be honest, when I compiled axiom--main--1 I also realized that
"pressing enter" did not help. I had to press "q".
But strangely now a lot of "ENTER" helped.
Tim still hasn't said why he needs the "final" in src/doc/endpaper.pamphlet
\usepackage[dvips,final,colorlinks=true,pdfstartview=FitH]
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:40:17AM +0200, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> I am just compiling patch-47 axiom on standard debian sarge.
>
> My compilation stops in the middle of compiling the documentation and
> just continues after I have pressed enter.
>
> I've tracked down the problem to that her
Mine says
\ProvidesPackage{hyperref}
[2003/01/22 v6.73n
Hypertext links for LaTeX]
\ProvidesPackage{keyval}
[1999/03/16 v1.13 key=value parser (DPC)]
That is Standard on Debian Sarge.
What do you happen to use? And why do you need that "final" anyway?
Ralf
On 04/06/2006
It appears that your hyperref package does not match my hyperref package.
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Hello,
I am just compiling patch-47 axiom on standard debian sarge.
My compilation stops in the middle of compiling the documentation and
just continues after I have pressed enter.
I've tracked down the problem to that here (see below).
Any hint? You probably will not tell me that my teTeX i
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{displaymath} ...
- \end{displaymath} like this:
- \begin{displaymath}
this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use::
!\begin{equation*}
...
\end{equation*}
like this:
\begin{eq
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation\*} ...
- \end{equation\*} like this:
this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use::
!\begin{equation*}
...
\end{equation*} like this:
--
forwarded from http://wiki.axiom-deve
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation!*} ...
- \end{equation!*} like this:
this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation\*} ...
\end{equation\*} like this:
--
forwarded from http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation*} ...
- \end{equation*} like this:
this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation!*} ...
\end{equation!*} like this:
--
forwarded from http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/[E
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{displaymath} ...
- \end{displaymath} like this:
- \begin{displaymath}
this !$$x^2$$, or !\[...\] or use !\begin{equation*} ...
\end{equation*} like this:
\begin{equation*}
??chang
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- this !$x^2$ to make: $ x^2 $, or !\( x^2 \).
this !$x^2$ to make: $ x^2 $, or !\( x^2 \) or use !\begin{math} ...
\end{math}.
??changed:
- To make a block equation that is not numbered, use !\begin{equation*} ...
- \end
Martin Rubey wrote:
Dear Ralf, *
I think that it is not a good idea to fix the set of packages allowed. Just an
example: suppose I wanted to write a package dealing with young tableaux -
quite probable, in fact. Then almost certainly I'll use the youngtab
package. But would you have thought of t
Dear Ralf, *
I think that it is not a good idea to fix the set of packages allowed. Just an
example: suppose I wanted to write a package dealing with young tableaux -
quite probable, in fact. Then almost certainly I'll use the youngtab
package. But would you have thought of this now already?
So I
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
\begin{axiom}
solve([x+y=a,x-y=b],[x,y])
\end{axiom}
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-develo
Changes http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
-display of LaTeX, Axiom and Reduce output on the MathAction
display of LaTeX, Axiom and Reduce output on the AboutMathAction
--
forwarded from http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
Seems to work perfectly using Epiphany 1.4.4 on Fedora Core 3.
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axi
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- jsMath.ProcessBeforeShowing()
jsMath.ProcessBeforeShowing()
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL P
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/authors/welcome.html says to use:
jsMath.ProcessBeforeShowing()
which will prevent the page from being displayed until all
the mathematics has be
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
- To use math mode in-line with text, surround the equation with $, like
To use math mode in-line with text, surround the equation with \$, like
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[E
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
With jsMath & Konqueror 3.3.2 (debian):
1. equations are not centered horizontally
2. certain characters are not appearing correctly (e.g. $x$ and the
large left square bracket). Both appear as a dot above the center
l
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
This guy is way better at javascript and tex than me...
Couple comments on jsMath: http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath/
You are correct it doesn't work in Konqueror.
I gotta say I like this solution. Putting the tex font m
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
On up-to-date Fedora Core 3 (x86-64) with the ttf math fonts
installed, Konqueror 3.3.1-4.3.FC3 displays the in-line
(...) overlapped with the text. The display
of the axiom output in (...
) is ok, but it is
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
??changed:
-It seems that it doesn't work (i.e., display right) on Konqueror 3.1.4.
It seems that jsMath doesn't work (i.e., display right) on Konqueror 3.1.4.
--removed:
-
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zop
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
It seems that it doesn't work (i.e., display right) on Konqueror 3.1.4.
Martin
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-develope
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
++added:
jsMath
http://www.math.union.edu/~dpvc/jsMath
jsMath might be a good alternative to graphics for the
display of LaTeX, Axiom and Reduce output on the MathAction
wiki.
See for example
"jsMathExperiment":http://page
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
\[ \int sin(x)dx \]
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
\begin{axiom}
integrate(sin(x),x)
\end{axiom}
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nong
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
integrate(sin(x),x)
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
$$ int sin(x)dx $$
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.
Changes http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/LaTeX/diff
--
\begin{axiom}
\[ \int sin(x)dx \]
\end{axiom}
--
forwarded from http://page.axiom-developer.org/zope/mathaction/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@no
72 matches
Mail list logo
