Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| The name issue has already caused problems. William Stein of SAGE
| believe he has Axiom installed when he actually has Fricas.
Of course, both you and me cannot speak for William Stein, but there
is strong evidence that he knows
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| I only made one request when you forked Axiom. I asked
| that, as a professional courtesy, you please use your
| own project name.
It is called OpenAxiom. When you starts OpenAxiom-1.1.0-xxx
it says
OpenAxiom: The Open Scientific Computation Plat
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| >| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
| >| >subject to rational analysis.
| >|
| >| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
| >| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
You win. I give up. I'm tired of this pointless debate.
There is no cure for the active denial of the obvious
and a simple, global rename is painfully obvious.
I only made one request when you forked Axiom. I asked
that, as a professional courtesy, you please use your
own project name.
Waldek s
>| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
>| >subject to rational analysis.
>|
>| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
>| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
>
>You reported that you fumbled your instal
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| >| The name issue has already caused problems. William Stein of SAGE
| >| believe he has Axiom installed when he actually has Fricas.
| >
| >Of course, both you and me cannot speak for William Stein, but there
| >is strong evidence that he knows he has FriCAS.
|
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
| >subject to rational analysis.
|
| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
You reported t
>| The name issue has already caused problems. William Stein of SAGE
>| believe he has Axiom installed when he actually has Fricas.
>
>Of course, both you and me cannot speak for William Stein, but there
>is strong evidence that he knows he has FriCAS.
Actually the Sage .spkg was named AxiomForSag
>It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
>subject to rational analysis.
Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
At minimum, since they both try to use the AXIOM shell vari
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| The name issue has already caused problems. William Stein of SAGE
| believe he has Axiom installed when he actually has Fricas.
Of course, both you and me cannot speak for William Stein, but there
is strong evidence that he knows he has FriCAS.
-- Gaby
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
|
| root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Oh, but they DO. Try to do parallel installations.
| > Being able to run Fricas and Axiom in parallel would be great.
With OpenAxiom and FriCAS, one can specify their own installation
directories at configure ti
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, C Y wrote:
| --- Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > But they wouldn't! Why would you think that any of your work was
| > lost when you install axiom after having installed friCAS?
|
| I think the concern here is accidentally overwriting an installation of
| Axiom
--- root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...[snip]...
> >Aldor, for example - unless Tim has plans I'm not aware of Axiom
> >itself won't be moving in the direction of using Aldor.
>
> Sigh. I replied to Bill's email a while ago that Axiom will have
> aldor available. I explained at that time that
>But please answer my question:
>
>> Do you really want to maintain
>>
>> axiom.el, fricas.el, openaxiom.el,
>> axiom.tm, fricas.tm, openaxiom.tm
>> axiom.php, fricas.php, openaxiom.php?
>
Since you posted a literate file for axiom.el I have it in the queue
to package it with Axiom. I have to set
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Oh, but they DO. Try to do parallel installations.
> Being able to run Fricas and Axiom in parallel would be great.
I cannot see any problem running friCAS and axiom in parallel. I do it, for
example (because I couldn't get Aldor to run with friCAS yet), and I
...[snip]...
>Aldor, for example - unless Tim has plans I'm not aware of Axiom
>itself won't be moving in the direction of using Aldor.
Sigh. I replied to Bill's email a while ago that Axiom will have
aldor available. I explained at that time that Bill was making
a statement about Axiom that was n
C Y <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think the concern here is accidentally overwriting an installation of Axiom
> with FriCAS, for example, or having the wrong library used due to path
> confusion. In my opinion that concern is valid.
So, how much work is it to reinstall axiom or friCAS, or open
>But they wouldn't! Why would you think that any of your work was
>lost when you install axiom after having installed friCAS? The only
>difference is, if the names wouldn't change, they wouldn't need to
>adjust paths they currently don't even know about.
Oh, but they DO. Try to do parallel insta
--- Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But they wouldn't! Why would you think that any of your work was
> lost when you install axiom after having installed friCAS?
I think the concern here is accidentally overwriting an installation of
Axiom with FriCAS, for example, or having the wrong
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It should be possible to have both systems installed, ala CMUCL and SBCL,
> even though they do the same things; if only for the reason that it would
> make it possible to compare results of system changes. Why should the user
> suddenly lose all of their Fricas
>Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> The following patch changes installation directory from
>> $PREFIX/lib/axiom to $PREFIX/lib/fricas and the name of installed
>> binary from $PREFIX/bin/axiom to $PREFIX/bin/fricas.
>>
>> I think that we should do this change to avoid conflicts with
Waldek Hebisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The following patch changes installation directory from
> $PREFIX/lib/axiom to $PREFIX/lib/fricas and the name of installed
> binary from $PREFIX/bin/axiom to $PREFIX/bin/fricas.
>
> I think that we should do this change to avoid conflicts with
> othe
22 matches
Mail list logo
