Dear all,
Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thus, I ask you to comment. I'll wait a week or so (unless I get only
> encouraging comments), if I do not get any comments until then, I'll just go
> ahead. Meanwhile I'll only reclassify.
In a wave of madness I did all the changes, no long
Dear Bill,
thanks for your detailed answer. Here a summary of the points where action is
still unclear:
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not so sure what to do with:
> >
> > Axiom on Windows
> > Axiom on Linux
> > Axiom on MacOSX
>
> These also would seem to interact
On 28 Dec 2007 14:55:43 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> Dear Bill, *
>
> > I am not against revising the status categories so they are more specific
> > and better organized but I do think it is essential that we treat all
> > versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the NewSynthesis Axiom
> > W
Dear Bill, *
> I am not against revising the status categories so they are more specific and
> better organized but I do think it is essential that we treat all
> versions/forks of Axiom on an equal footing on the NewSynthesis Axiom
> Wiki. Doing things the way you suggest does not seem sufficient
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > (I see, you are experimenting with running all axioms on
> > MathAction?)
> >
>
> Yes, I have a preliminary version of the axiom-wiki installed at
> newsynthesis.org (aka. sage.math) that does support all three
> versions/forks of axiom. This is easily
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> > ...
> > Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by
> > the proposal above?
> >
>
> The version of axiom that no longer exhibits the problem.
But I'd guess that would vary from i
On 14 Dec 2007 06:42:13 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> ...
> Sorry, I can't see: which version of axiom would be preferred by
> the proposal above?
>
The version of axiom that no longer exhibits the problem.
Regards,
Bill Page.
___
Axiom-developer maili
Bill, Gaby,
> > I guess the simplest solution is to replace the "status" categories
> > as follows:
> >
> > open ... open in all versions
> > closed ... closed in all versions
> >
> > closed in FriCAS
> > closed in OpenAxiom
> > closed in Axiom
> >
> > open in FriCAS --- closed in Axiom and Ope
Martin,
On 13 Dec 2007 08:08:05 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
> ...
> > > 2) By magic, or Bill Page, we introduce the possibility of closing
> > > issues for any subset of {axiom, open-axiom, fricas}. I have
> > > no idea how that could work, however. In particular, if one
> > > selects
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I see two possibilities:
> >
> > 1) Since MathAction runs FriCAS, and FriCAS applies patches
> > from open-axiom and axiom relatively quickly, we close those
> > issues that are fixed in FriCAS.
> >
>
> No, I do not think that is a good idea. I
On 12 Dec 2007 20:47:50 +0100, Martin Rubey wrote:
>
> since FriCAS is progressing quite rapidly what concerns closing
> issues, how shall we proceed on issuetracker?
http://axiom-wiki.newsynthesis.org/IssueTracker
>
> I see two possibilities:
>
> 1) Since MathAction runs FriCAS, and FriCAS appli
11 matches
Mail list logo
