On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| >| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
| >| >subject to rational analysis.
| >|
| >| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
| >| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
>| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
>| >subject to rational analysis.
>|
>| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
>| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
>
>You reported that you fumbled your instal
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, root wrote:
| >It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
| >subject to rational analysis.
|
| Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
| that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
You reported t
>It seems to me that we have more FUD that concrete data that we can
>subject to rational analysis.
Sigh. So you don't read the mailing lists. However, you'll remember
that Axiom was clobbered by the newer install on the windows platform.
At minimum, since they both try to use the AXIOM shell vari
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Martin Rubey wrote:
|
| root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > Oh, but they DO. Try to do parallel installations.
| > Being able to run Fricas and Axiom in parallel would be great.
With OpenAxiom and FriCAS, one can specify their own installation
directories at configure ti
On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, C Y wrote:
| --- Martin Rubey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > But they wouldn't! Why would you think that any of your work was
| > lost when you install axiom after having installed friCAS?
|
| I think the concern here is accidentally overwriting an installation of
| Axiom
