RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-20 Thread Page, Bill
On Monday, December 19, 2005 1:29 PM Michel Lavaud wrote: > ... > Bill Page wrote: > > The other website is called the Axiom Portal and it is based on > > Plone and Zwiki (with the same extensions). > > > > http://portal.axiom-developer.org > > > > Right now the I18N product for Plone have not

RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-20 Thread Page, Bill
On Monday, December 19, 2005 1:29 PM Michel Lavaud wrote: > ... > I created SandBoxLaTeX and tried to put some accented letters > in it, > > http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandBoxLaTeX#bottom > > could you tell me if they are correctly displayed on English > configuration? > Yes, the text loo

RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-19 Thread michel . lavaud
On 18 Dec 2005 at 2:10, Bill Page wrote: > My opinion is that it is highest priority to improve the > scientific contents even if the quality of the English is not > perfect. You will notice that even though English is my first > language, I still manage occasionally to introduce bad syntax > and

RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-17 Thread Bill Page
On December 16, 2005 8:05 PM Michel Lavaud wrote: > ... it is not so easy for non English-speaking people to > modify texts in English, as one (well, at least me :-) is > always frightened to introduce bad syntax, incorrect words > so that "improving" might appear "corrupting" to English- > speaki

RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-16 Thread michel . lavaud
Hello Bill, On 16 Dec 2005 at 10:16, Bill Page wrote: > web site. What we need most I think is for someone to explicitly > take on the task of helping to maintain and develop the FAQ. > It is easy for anyone who has a browser to do this from anywhere > in the world. Yes, I believe you, but it is

RE: [Axiom-developer] Axiom guidance

2005-12-16 Thread Bill Page
On December 15, 2005 6:01 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > ... > I somehow have the impression that the FAQ section is a bit > unwritten and does not really invite people to put in their > questions that will perhaps be answered by somebody who can. > Bill, what do you think about making it more explicit