Page, Bill writes:
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/images/book--main--1/bookvol1.tex
>
> As a pdf file this is about 800 pages. As html it generates nearly
> 600 png files and my browsers (both FireFox and Explorer) die while
> trying to render it. And the download is pretty horrendous
Eitan,
On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 1:12 PM you wrote:
>
> > > I tried to compile the file for native dvi latex output and
> > > was successful only after introducing the following disabling
> > > instructions.
> > >
> > > \let\spadfunFrom=\empty
> > > \def\spadgraph#1{}
> > >
On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 9:05 AM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
> ..
> I remember I have seen that thing in graphviz.sty.
> Nevertheless, could you send over this SAGE file. I don't
> have SAGE running here.
>
See attachment below.
> >> The \begin{axiomoutput}{somenumber} ... \end{axiomoutput}
> >> e
> > I tried to compile the file for native dvi latex output and was
> > successful only after introducing the following disabling instructions.
> >
> > \let\spadfunFrom=\empty
> > \def\spadgraph#1{}
> > \let\nwfilename=\empty
> > \long\def\nwbegincode#1\nwendcode{
HyperDoc processes exactly the lines preceded by +++ . So the line
isomorphismTypes: Set L -> Generator %;
is out of reach for HyperDoc.
I'd like to have ALLPROSE instead of \adthisname{} write
\spadfun{isomorphismTypes}. And, if possible
Would you be happy with the \addefinename{...} thin
I tried to compile the file for native dvi latex output and was
successful only after introducing the following disabling instructions.
\let\spadfunFrom=\empty
\def\spadgraph#1{}
\let\nwfilename=\empty
\long\def\nwbegincode#1\nwendcode{}
\long\def\moddef#1\endmoddef{}
> instead of
> \begin{axiominput}
> solve(x**49-49*x**4+9 = 0,1.e-49)
> \end{axiominput}
> \begin{axiomoutput}
> ... repeat the thing above (which should be autogenerated anyway)
> \end{axiomoutput}
>
> I have no way to simply modify a .sty or .4ht file to make that coloring
> happen
Ralf,
> I believe it would, but the problem is that I cannot easily make the
> documentation smaller, because it would basically mean that I find the
> problem myself.
Yes, in the sense that the problem will be isolated and so its cause
easier to identify. For pagination essentially one
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > No, I'm not. I need this in the generated .spad (or .as) file, i.e., here
> > +++ \begin{addescription}{Generates all isomorphism types.}
> > +++ \end{addescription}
> > +++ \begin{ToDo}
> > +++ \begin{rhx} 14-Aug-2006:
> > +++ It is no
On 08/22/2006 05:26 PM, Eitan Gurari wrote:
> I wouldn't care too much. tex4ht can split pages at section points (or
> in fact anywhere you like). Unfortunately, for some strange reason I do
> not get it to work with ALLPROSE. Maybe I haven't tried hard enough. And
> it was not so urgent
On 08/22/2006 05:26 PM, root wrote:
Well, maybe we should start with dhmatrix. I somehow agree with you and
Eitan. Writing TeX should not be considered the best way of writing a
.pamphlet file. LaTeX is so much more structured that it is easier to
convert to other formats. One cannot do all the
> Quite doable. Now, the question is: Are Axiom developers and
> users really motivated to use this sort of thing??
probably i am; but i can't figure out what 'this sort of thing' is.
*) what are you trying to achieve?
*) where can i see examples
*) what are the benefits/cost?
*) what tools do i
On 08/22/2006 04:20 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...] in that chunk, then that corresponds to \atthistype. (And, yes Martin,
that can be replaced on the fly by the appropriate \adtype{DomainName},
GREAT! could you send me an appropriate patch, please. The
> Well, maybe we should start with dhmatrix. I somehow agree with you and
> Eitan. Writing TeX should not be considered the best way of writing a
> .pamphlet file. LaTeX is so much more structured that it is easier to
> convert to other formats. One cannot do all the TeX tricks and outputs
> eq
> I wouldn't care too much. tex4ht can split pages at section points (or
> in fact anywhere you like). Unfortunately, for some strange reason I do
> not get it to work with ALLPROSE. Maybe I haven't tried hard enough. And
> it was not so urgent to me.
It should be easy for me to identify
> to significant, but I just did a few experiments using htlatex on
>
> http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/images/book--main--1/bookvol1.tex
I tried to compile the file for native dvi latex output and was
successful only after introducing the following disabling instructions.
\let\spadf
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> [...] in that chunk, then that corresponds to \atthistype. (And, yes
> >> Martin,
> >> that can be replaced on the fly by the appropriate \adtype{DomainName},
> > GREAT! could you send me an appropriate patch, please. Then I can document
> > my
> >
Maybe, I am wrong, but for me DHMATRIX is just a domain. A library is
something like libaldor, libalgebra, libaxiom.
I don't think there is much (formal) difference between a domain and a library.
If one domain for you makes a library, so be it. But for me a library
covers a certain small are
Hi Ralf,
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Aha. Maybe you were misled.
no, I don't think so.
> In some sense you are right that I would like such a system for all of
> Axiom. [...]
Yes, but I think that converting the algebra to allprose would be a good start.
> >> And as Bill point
Hi Martin,
On 08/22/2006 02:45 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Martin wrote:
why won't we use ALLPROSE?
I simply have the suspicion that Martin talks about pamphlet files of the form
.spad.pamphlet and anybody else means pamphlets with general content s
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/images/book--main--1/bookvol1.tex
As a pdf file this is about 800 pages. As html it generates nearly
600 png files and my browsers (both FireFox and Explorer) die while
trying to render it. And the download is pretty horrendous anyway
:( htlatex indicates a large
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Martin wrote:
> > why won't we use ALLPROSE?
> I simply have the suspicion that Martin talks about pamphlet files of the form
> .spad.pamphlet and anybody else means pamphlets with general content so also
> .lisp.pamphlet or Makefile.pamphlet. Am I wr
Anyway, would it be a good start to take dhmatrix. We could tex->latex it while
we try to get an html out of it.
The one thing I don't understand about all this is:
why won't we use ALLPROSE?
All the current pamphlet stuff is legacy code. It simply doesn't fit so
easily into ALLPROSE, yet ma
Ralf,
Thanks for the explanations about .4ht etc.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 5:09 AM you wrote:
> ...
> Bill Page wrote:
> > When generating .html with embedded images for the formula
> > where do the image files go? Subdirectory? Since there will
> > be multiple pamphlet files on the wiki, we
Dear Ralf,
Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Anyway, would it be a good start to take dhmatrix. We could tex->latex it
> while
> we try to get an html out of it.
The one thing I don't understand about all this is:
why won't we use ALLPROSE?
> On Monday, August 21, 2006 1:08 PM Marti
If for the purpose of translating that file to html you provide
an appropriate axiom.sty (and axiom.4ht) which can be different
from the current existing axiom.sty, then I believe that should
be doable.
Sorry, I've forgotten most of what I once knew about tex4ht. :)
Of course we want only one so
Eitan,
On Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:03 AM you wrote:
>
> I added a pointer to instructions at the end of the first
> paragraph in
>
>http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html
>
> Hopefully they are not buggy.
>
Thank you! I feel a little more human now. :) and I've now
> I am "scratching
> my head" ... how do I update my installation?
Bill,
I added a pointer to instructions at the end of the first paragraph in
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bugfixes.html
Hopefully they are not buggy.
-eitan
On Monday, August 21, 2006 10:21 PM Eitan Gurari wrote:
> ...
> > Eitan Gurari was also working on a jsMath version of tex4ht.
> > I am not sure of the status of that version.
>
> A jsmath configuration for tex4ht went public on 21 Dec 2005 (see
> http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/~gurari/TeX4ht/bu
> > \documentclass{article}
> > \usepackage{axiom}
> > \begin{document}
> > ...
> > \end{document}
> What is axiom.4ht? Can it be present in the source .tex even
> if I just run latex to get the standard dvi, ps, and pdf?
The \usepackage{axiom} instruction requests a general purpose style
Ralf,
On Monday, August 21, 2006 6:15 PM you wrote:
>
> On 08/21/2006 04:43 PM, Bill Page wrote:
> > Martin,
> >
> > On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote:
> >> Bill Page writes:
> >>> As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a
> >>> little differently with only a "thumbnail" displa
On 08/21/2006 04:43 PM, Bill Page wrote:
Martin,
On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote:
Bill Page writes:
As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a
little differently with only a "thumbnail" displayed on
the web page containing links to the pdf and dvi format
generated by LaTeX.
Martin,
On August 21, 2006 4:01 AM you wrote:
>
> Bill Page writes:
> > As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a
> > little differently with only a "thumbnail" displayed on
> > the web page containing links to the pdf and dvi format
> > generated by LaTeX. Originally we had plann
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As you know, pamphlet files on MathAction are treated a little differently
> with only a "thumbnail" displayed on the web page containing links to the pdf
> and dvi format generated by LaTeX. Originally we had planned to use TeX4ht
> to produce a web page
34 matches
Mail list logo
