root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| done. it will take 8-24 hours --t
Thanks!
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
done. it will take 8-24 hours --t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/axiom-developer
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Sourceforge has a compile farm for various platforms. We should take
| advantage of that so that the silver branch get testing, not just by
| its developers but also by other means out there. I'm no Axiom
| administrator, so please could you
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| sigh. just can't win this month. just found out why it failed on me.
| i created code to test for the condition in a test file but i missed
| the compiler:: package and instead ended up testing for the symbol in
| the boot package.
Can I take that you concur you
sigh. just can't win this month. just found out why it failed on me.
i created code to test for the condition in a test file but i missed
the compiler:: package and instead ended up testing for the symbol in
the boot package.
my mistake. sorry about that. --t
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| my testing of your patches fails.
| i don't see how your tests could have succeeded.
|
| there must be something missing. the point of the patch is to
| suppress printing of compiler notes. your patches remove my
| patches but they do not suppress compiler not
my testing of your patches fails.
i don't see how your tests could have succeeded.
there must be something missing. the point of the patch is to
suppress printing of compiler notes. your patches remove my
patches but they do not suppress compiler notes. somewhere
in initialization you must add
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I've applied your patches. they will be available at the next release.
Thanks!
| Note that you didn't remove the
| <>=
| chunk from lsp/Makefile even though you deleted the corresponding file.
Fixed thusly.
Tested on an i686-pc-linux-gnu.
-- Gaby
lsp/Chan
I've applied your patches. they will be available at the next release.
Note that you didn't remove the
<>=
chunk from lsp/Makefile even though you deleted the corresponding file.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://li
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Gosh, I forgot the real thing.
| > It is there, real this time.
|
| 2 points,
|
| 1) did you test the patches? did you do a full system erase,
| system checkout, system build, system test?
|
| 2) you changed not only the current system (gcl-2.6.8pre) but
Greg,
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 2:51 PM you wrote:
>
> Humm it seems to me that all the axiom-developer's mailing
> list archives are in your mind :-)>
:)
You also can download the axiom-developer email archives here:
ftp://lists.gnu.org/axiom-developer
;) and of course anyone can search t
hi Bill,
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 13:06 -0400, Page, Bill a écrit :
[...]
> Tim has already successfully (more or less) compiled hyperdoc
> using Cygwin. See this thread:
>
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-developer/2005-12/msg00439.html
> http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/axiom-de
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:47 PM Vanuxem Grégory wrote:
> >
> > GCL does not compile on Cygwin. Some portions of GCL are related
> > to Cygwin but they are not maintained anymore as far as I know.
> > GCL on Windows uses the MinGW/MSYS environment (so it's not
> > possible to build X based appl
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 18:19 +0200, Vanuxem Grégory a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 10:29 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
>
> [...]
>
> > we should just be able to type "./configure; make make install"
> > and have it working. Expect that soon for Unix-like systems!
> > (And I hope
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 11:36 AM C Y wrote:
> ...
> Quick check - is there anybody now doing active development
> on Axiom for Windows? I'm sure we have users there but anybody
> who knows how to compile it?
The procedure for compiling Axiom on Windows is here:
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/
Hi,
Le jeudi 04 mai 2006 à 10:29 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis a écrit :
[...]
> we should just be able to type "./configure; make make install"
> and have it working. Expect that soon for Unix-like systems!
> (And I hope it will work for Cygwin-based systems too.)
GCL does not compile on Cygwin. So
--- root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> participation is great and i've accepted almost every patch
> sent to me. i'm hoping to see a drastic increase in the
> number of tested patches.
Tim, how is something like the Emacs mode handled? It's not properly a
patch and it's far from done, but just s
--- "Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think the developers of apt-get and yum might agree with
> you. ;) But I think most developers would prefer to take care
> of this themselves.
>
> People who want to work with Axiom without these hassles
> should install the appropriate binary versi
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Testing for both versions of GCL are running on x86.
full system build + test completed for GCL-2.6.8pre.
Now launching build for GCL-2.6.7.
-- Gaby
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-develope
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| > now i have to waste time doing a re-install of FC5. I do NOT
| > want this to happen to an axiom user, at least not because they
| > tried to install axiom.
|
| If you do not trust programs that attempt to automatically
| resolve dependencies th
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| most people either use axiom or they don't. very, very
| few people will make changes. thus we who make changes
| have a responsibility to maintain the quality of the system.
I concur with that assessment.
| i'm applying personal standards here but i do
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > Gosh, I forgot the real thing.
| > It is there, real this time.
|
| 2 points,
Thanks for the quick review.
|
| 1) did you test the patches? did you do a full system erase,
| system checkout, system build, system test?
* I have not checked in the patch s
Tim,
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 12:59 AM you wrote:
> ...
> Bill Page wrote:
> >
> > I *strongly* disagree with this. Even the GCL build itself
> > will stop if it does not find the necessary prerequisits.
> > Satisfying prerequists is not the job of the build software.
> > This is handled by oth
On Thursday, May 04, 2006 1:00 AM Tim Daly (root) wrote:
>
> gcl-2.6.8pre is the "correct version". see the GCLVERSION in the
> top level Makefile. i'm not sure how you can check the version
> number in GCL but there must be a way.
>
echo '(lisp-implementation-version)' | gcl
Regards,
Bill P
gcl-2.6.8pre is the "correct version". see the GCLVERSION in the
top level Makefile. i'm not sure how you can check the version
number in GCL but there must be a way.
t
___
Axiom-developer mailing list
Axiom-developer@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org
> > ... it takes a long time to make changes to axiom assuming
> > you're going to ensure they are correct before releasing
> > them to the world.
>
> This is the wrong assumption to make about open source. You
> are not "releasing" a product, you are doing collaborative
> development - hopefully
> Gosh, I forgot the real thing.
> It is there, real this time.
2 points,
1) did you test the patches? did you do a full system erase,
system checkout, system build, system test?
2) you changed not only the current system (gcl-2.6.8pre) but
the previous system (gcl-2.6.7). did you test both v
root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| if you follow the GCL discussions from the past it is possible
| to re-engineer axiom so it will run on a natively installed GCL.
| to do that you need to:
|
| *) change configure to detect if gcl is installed
| *) change configure to ensure that the
Tim,
On Wednesday, May 03, 2006 11:20 PM you wrote:
> ... it takes a long time to make changes to axiom assuming
> you're going to ensure they are correct before releasing
> them to the world.
This is the wrong assumption to make about open source. You
are not "releasing" a product, you are doin
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| | | As far as I know this patch is irrelevant
| |
| | Great! I'm preparing a patchlet to remove its application to the
| | silver branch.
|
| Bill --
|
| Here is a patch for it.
Gosh, I forgot the real thing.
It is there, real this time.
> | (setq compiler::*suppress-compiler-notes* t)
this change is already integrated into the new bookvol5.pamphlet file.
however that file is radically changed from the current version
and is not yet ready to be released to the outside world. when
that major change is released in a future version
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| "Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| | On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| | >
| | > Tim Daly (root) writes:
| | >
| | > | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter
| | > | and i worked on creating t
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Tim Daly (root) writes:
| >
| > | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter
| > | and i worked on creating tail recursion in AKCL. This was
| > | just a debugging message
"Page, Bill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Tim Daly (root) writes:
| >
| > | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter
| > | and i worked on creating tail recursion in AKCL. This was
| > | just a debugging message
On Tuesday, May 02, 2006 2:12 AM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> Tim Daly (root) writes:
>
> | yep. it turns off the "tail recursion" noise. bill schelter
> | and i worked on creating tail recursion in AKCL. This was
> | just a debugging message at the time. For some reason it
> | outlived its useful
"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On May 1, 2006 4:34 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > It would be helpful if we could also have the GCL-2.6.8pre patches
| > also in the silver branch. In particular, we should have all the
| > current codes in the gold branch in the silver branch .
| >
On May 1, 2006 4:34 PM Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
>
> It would be helpful if we could also have the GCL-2.6.8pre patches
> also in the silver branch. In particular, we should have all the
> current codes in the gold branch in the silver branch .
>
I suggest:
tla delta -diffs axiom--main--1-patc
Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| After some investigation, I nailed down the problem.
| The file lsp/gcl-2.6.7/cmpnew/gcl_cmpflet.lsp (unlike any other files
| that are subject to patches) has DOS-style newlines which is not
| reflected in the patch being applied. I don't know how
38 matches
Mail list logo
