[jira] Assigned: (AXISCPP-621) Support for the WSDL construct choice

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-621?page=all ] Dushshantha Chandradasa reassigned AXISCPP-621: --- Assign To: Dushshantha Chandradasa > Support for the WSDL construct choice > - > > K

[jira] Updated: (AXISCPP-636) Generated code have a bug

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-636?page=all ] Chinthana Danapala updated AXISCPP-636: --- Attachment: Test.wsdl This is the WSDL use and mare information go to following mail arcade. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11152285805&r=1&

[jira] Created: (AXISCPP-636) Generated code have a bug

Generated code have a bug -- Key: AXISCPP-636 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-636 Project: Axis-C++ Type: Bug Components: WSDL processing - Doc Versions: 1.6 Alpha Reporter: Chinthana Danapala Attachments: T

RE: Attachments

> I'm trying to put it for Apache13 now I am not sure of the effort required here. However, are the changes minimal? Do we have modules/classes that can be used across Apache versions? In other words, are these changes apache version specific? Thanks, Samisa... -Original Message- From: R

RE: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

OK, Looks like the responses are more biased towards keeping both. One of the main reasons that I raised this was to cut down on maintenance efforts, not only the code, but also the docs. In some situations, such as in case of supporting attachments Rangika seem to have to update both modules. An

RE: Attachments

Please commit the program used to test as well. Thanks, Samisa... -Original Message- From: Rangika Mendis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:23 AM To: Apache AXIS C Developers Subject: Re: Attachments Hi Samisa, yes, the sample is in \c\samples\server\mime Attach

Re: Attachments

Hi Samisa, yes, the sample is in \c\samples\server\mime Attachment support is only added to Apache 2 currently. I'm trying to put it for Apache13 now Regds Rangika On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 09:36 +, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: > Hi Rangika, > Is a sample also in place? > > Thanks, > Sami

Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

Me too. The 1.3 family has been well tested very stable and widely accepted. Also we have had problems with Apache 2.0 (even without axis) on windows and 1.3 never troubled us. +1 to have both. sanjaya. - Original Message - From: "Sanjiva Weerawarana" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Apache AXIS

Re: Attachments

Hi Rangika, Is a sample also in place? Thanks, Samisa... On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 12:06, Rangika Mendis wrote: > Hi All, > > I commited attachment stuff now. > > It's in the cvs head. > > It's not added to the ANT build scripts. > > Can anyone add them pls.I can't add because Ant is not

Re: Fw: Attachments

Thank you Mark for adding attachment stuff to ant build.I'll incorporate getAllAttachments for Apache 13. Regds Rangika On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:58 +0100, Mark Whitlock wrote: > > > > Hi Rangika, > I've fixed the ant build. mod_axis.cpp didn't compile for Apache13 because > getAllAttachments

RE: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

I have to vehemently agree .. there are many who are using 1.3 and dropping 1.3 will cut out a significant part of the customer base! Sanjiva. On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:06 -0600, Lilantha Darshana wrote: > My -1 for dropping 1.3 support. > > I strongly believe, there are so many instances out the

serializeAsAttribute

Hi All I am an Axis newbie. I was going through the code to find a solution for http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-634. which basically deals with specifying attributes in the SOAP-RESPONSE. I noticed a method SoapSerializer::serializeAsAttribute in SoapSerializer.cpp. I have not seen

RE: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

My -1 for dropping 1.3 support. I strongly believe, there are so many instances out there who still depends on 1.3 server and in need for web services to support their legacy services. thanks -Lilantha -Original Message- From: Samisa Abeysinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursda

Fw: Attachments

Hi Rangika, I've fixed the ant build. mod_axis.cpp didn't compile for Apache13 because getAllAttachments was not on ApacheTransport. So I added in a dummy method. Mark Mark Whitlock IBM - Forwarded by Mark Whitlock/UK/IBM on 05/05/2005 16:47 -

Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

That one's easy... Since Axis is a relatively new 'product', it is perfectly reasonable to support only Apache 2.  No one is deploying new edge or middleware applications using Apache 1.3 ... not for a long time. Thanks, Ken Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Hi all, I have noticed widespread use o

Re: Attachments

Hi All, I commited attachment stuff now. It's in the cvs head. It's not added to the ANT build scripts. Can anyone add them pls.I can't add because Ant is not working for me. Regds Rangika On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 13:59 +0600, Rangika Mendis wrote: > Hi John, > > When I typed the followin

[jira] Closed: (AXISCPP-599) wininstall-guide.html have to improve

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-599?page=all ] Samisa Abeysinghe closed AXISCPP-599: - Resolution: Fixed Fix Version: 1.6 Alpha Applied the changes > wininstall-guide.html have to improve > ---

[jira] Assigned: (AXISCPP-599) wininstall-guide.html have to improve

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXISCPP-599?page=all ] Samisa Abeysinghe reassigned AXISCPP-599: - Assign To: Samisa Abeysinghe > wininstall-guide.html have to improve > - > > Key: AXISCPP-599 >

Re: Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

I've been thinking this too - we should go to the user list first. Samisa Abeysinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/2005 16:30 Please respond to "Apache AXIS C Developers List" To Apache AXIS C Developers List cc Subject Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3 Hi all, I have noticed wid

Apache 2.0 vs Apache 1.3

Hi all, I have noticed widespread use of Apache 2.0 and the number of queries we are getting on Apache 1.3 is near 0. Given this, would it be a bad idea to support only Apache 2 on server side? This will simplify the docs as well. Thoughts please. Thanks, Samisa...

Re: Attachments

Hi John, When I typed the following command ant -f test.xml -Ddir.xmlParser=/usr/local/xerces-c-src_2_6_0/lib - Ddir.release=/home/rangika/checkout_May04/obj/package/axis-c-1.6.0- Linux-bin -Dtest.name=SimpleRef > rangika.log I got the following output in the log. Buildfile: test.xml pre-ini

Re: Attachments

Hi Rangika, which bit of the ANT build is not working for you? If you need any help please feel free to post it up and we'll take a look. Rangika Mendis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 05/05/2005 08:10 Please respond to "Apache AXIS C Developers List" To Apache AXIS C Developers cc Subj

Attachments

Hi All, I tested attachments (on server side)in Windows using VC (Not using ANT build) & it's working. I couldn't test with the ANT build because ANT is not building properly. Once ANT is working I can check in Windows & Linux.Till then I'm not committing the code since I don't know whether the