[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12626893#action_12626893
]
Damitha Kumarage commented on AXIS2C-1254:
--
I had a look at your patch. Is not it
Hi Danushka,
override options come into play when we reuse operation client. Say
after sending some application messages you need to override some
options. Then you create new options struct and called svc client's
set_override_options. What happens is that existing options struct
becomes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12626897#action_12626897
]
Supun Kamburugamuva commented on AXIS2C-1254:
-
I think if a client
override options come into play when we reuse operation client. Say
after sending some application messages you need to override some
options. Then you create new options struct and called svc client's
set_override_options. What happens is that existing options struct
becomes parent and your
Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
Hi Devs,
There is a requirement to have support for custom HTTP headers in
Axis2/C. To do that we need to let the operation client know the
header details. One options is to set headers in service client
options and pass them on to operation client as the
So what is the option that you propose?
HTTP_HEADERS = array of (key = value) ?
An array of axis2_http_header_t*.
Danushka
--
Danushka Menikkumbura
Technical Lead, WSO2 Inc.
blog : http://danushka-menikkumbura.blogspot.com/
http://wso2.com/ - The Open Source SOA Company
Danushka Menikkumbura wrote:
So what is the option that you propose?
HTTP_HEADERS = array of (key = value) ?
An array of axis2_http_header_t*.
But then the user need to create axis2_http_header_t instances. Can we
use an string key value pair and covert them to the header type internally?
But then the user need to create axis2_http_header_t instances. Can we
use an string key value pair and covert them to the header type
internally?
No he doesn't have to. The interface call accepts the name and the value
and it in turn creates the header instance.
The interface call :