Re: [axis2] current state of the WSDL2C codegen tool

Hi Dimuthu, Your progress seems well phased. Dimuthu Gamage wrote: Hi, This is just to update the progress of the WSDL2C codegen tool. I completed almost all the utility functions required by the codegen engine. Current source is uploaded to http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2C-198.

Re: [axis2] wsdl2c codegen tool directory structure-with correct format

Hi Dimuthu, Why do we create a sub folder inside lib called and put codegen libs there. We can just put them in libs folder as we do with other modules. Also I would prefer a single codegen dll in use. Similary we can put the executable directly under deploy/bin. thanks Damitha Dimuthu Gamage

Re: [axis2] current state of the WSDL2C codegen tool

Hi, Thank you for the comments.:) I still not started woring with woden API. As you pointed out in the chat, I will study the headers and woden/java user guide first. Anyway I will definitely need your help to understand it. Regards Dimuthu Damitha Kumarage wrote: Hi Dimuthu, Your

Re: [axis2] wsdl2c codegen tool directory structure-with correct format

Hi, The reason I plan to create seperate DLL's for extensions and emitters is, they should be loaded dynamically according to the configuration file by reflection. Since there will be many .so files for each extension and emitters I thought its better to create sepereate folders. Aren't

[Axis2] Do we need phase related stuff in public API

Do we need, phase, phase_resolver and phase_holder in the public API? I do not tthink we do. Samisa... - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Axis2] Do we need phase related stuff in public API

Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Do we need, phase, phase_resolver and phase_holder in the public API? I do not tthink we do. Samisa... I think, phases_info too belong to that category and should not be exposed Samisa... - To

Re: [Axis2] Do we need phase related stuff in public API

Hi Samisa, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Do we need, phase, phase_resolver and phase_holder in the public API? No I do not tthink we do. Samisa... I think, phases_info too belong to that category and should not be exposed You are correct Thanks Damitha

Re: [Axis2] Do we need phase related stuff in public API

Great, then lets move them out into the inner folders. Could you please help. Samisa... Damitha Kumarage wrote: Hi Samisa, Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Samisa Abeysinghe wrote: Do we need, phase, phase_resolver and phase_holder in the public API? No I do not tthink we do. Samisa...

Re: [axis2] wsdl2c codegen tool directory structure-with correct format

Hi Dimuthu, Dimuthu Gamage wrote: Hi, The reason I plan to create seperate DLL's for extensions and emitters is, they should be loaded dynamically according to the configuration file by reflection. Since there will be many .so files for each extension and emitters I thought its better to

[Axis2] Woden/C API doc categorization

Hi Damitha, The following is the break down that I came up with for woden header documentation. However, I need help to identify the headers that fall into each category. Please help me to identify those, or may be you could do the doc organizing yourself if you have some spare time

[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-849) NullPointerException in OutInAxisOperationClient

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-849?page=comments#action_12418581 ] Deepal Jayasinghe commented on AXIS2-849: - yes , it is fixed in current SVN NullPointerException in OutInAxisOperationClient

Re: [jira] Updated: (AXIS2-789) A SOAPFault targeted at a service (e.g. using WS-Addressing FaultTo) is not passed to the service object

Sanjiva, All, I'd still like to make this change. Have you been convinced or do we need more discussion? Thanks, David P.S. This scenario has just been raised on the user list [1] [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-userm=115158272830597w=2 David Illsley/UK/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on

[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-829) WSDL service builder fails to see service definition when it comes from an import

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-829?page=comments#action_12418611 ] Deepal Jayasinghe commented on AXIS2-829: - applied the patch , btw does this patch solve your problem ? WSDL service builder fails to see service definition when it

Re: Re : sending soap messages asynchronously

Hi axis 1, no axis 2, yes Cheers, --- Phani Sekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, We are implementing NETCONF on SOAP over HTTP. We are using Axis. We require the Axis web service to send some soap messages asynchronously to the Axis client without any initiation. Ofcourse for the

Re: Re : sending soap messages asynchronously

Sry, without initiation? Dont think so. Cheers --- Phani Sekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, We are implementing NETCONF on SOAP over HTTP. We are using Axis. We require the Axis web service to send some soap messages asynchronously to the Axis client without any initiation.

[jira] Created: (AXIS-2516) Wrongful Java Code Generation - when using union in simple types.

Wrongful Java Code Generation - when using union in simple types. - Key: AXIS-2516 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2516 Project: Apache Axis Type: Bug Components: WSDL processing

[jira] Commented: (AXIS-1794) body in header when using unqualified part attribute in soap:header

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1794?page=comments#action_12418645 ] Jason W commented on AXIS-1794: --- I am having the same issue as this. I was just wondering if anyone knew a way to force the call object into the actual body? It puts all the

[jira] Updated: (AXIS2-837) Java2WSDL should generate a WSDL interface that accepts an empty SOAP Body

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-837?page=all ] Venkatakrishnan updated AXIS2-837: -- Attachment: Axis2-Java2WSDL-Patch-30-Jun.diff Hi, Here is a patch that fixes this issue. I have also refactored the code in SchemaGenerator to look more

[jira] Commented: (AXIS-643) Bad default namespace on response

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-643?page=comments#action_12418685 ] Jason W commented on AXIS-643: -- I am having the same type of issue, using Axis 1.4, Tomcat 5.5 and it sends it perfectly after I turned off putting the send information in the

Re: Services

Hi Dan, I'm interested in what you're doing with JMX, as I do a lot of axis2 programming with JBoss / EJB which as you may know is a very heavily user of JMX. See my comments inline: On 6/30/06, Dan Peder Eriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I'm a master degree student from the university

[jira] Commented: (AXIS2-847) rampart is not included in distribution

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-847?page=comments#action_12418749 ] Kent Tong commented on AXIS2-847: - Thanks. But where can one download the src distribution? I just checked but only the .mar file was available. rampart is not included in

[jira] Updated: (AXIS2-847) rampart is not included in distribution

[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-847?page=all ] Ruchith Udayanga Fernando updated AXIS2-847: Attachment: rampart-1.0-src.zip The SVN tag used for the release is this :