-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
+1 for both the suggestions.
Ajith Ranabahu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/17/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since the topic is about jar dependencies, I'd like to comment on two
> aspects.
>
> 1. As one can see there is a huge number of de
+1 from me.
For some further discussion on this see [1]. In particular [2] gives
rationale for why its ok to give more weight to POX over SOAP 1.1.
Sanjiva.
[1] http://wso2.org/mailarchive/registry-dev/2007-October/thread.html#473
[2] http://wso2.org/mailarchive/registry-dev/2007-October/00054
Hi,
On 10/17/07, Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Since the topic is about jar dependencies, I'd like to comment on two
> aspects.
>
> 1. As one can see there is a huge number of dependencies we have in
> Axis2 and I think we ship almo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
>> Is there a need for axis2-optional.jar?
> Well , I am bit worried about having a jar like this.
Can you please explain why?
>> I'm +1 for axis2-server.jar & axis2-client.jar.
> may be or may be not. Axis2 kernel and java2w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Deepal jayasinghe wrote:
> +1,
> Not only that I am not that happy with the current "Options" object and
> the way it handle the properties. I think we should use Options object
> only as a mechanism to configure the ServiceClient and all the
> propert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Since the topic is about jar dependencies, I'd like to comment on two
aspects.
1. As one can see there is a huge number of dependencies we have in
Axis2 and I think we ship almost all of them with our releases. Why
should we release both xbeans and ji
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ryan Vanderwerf updated AXIS2-3281:
---
Description:
I am using the POJO interaction I used and found an error in the XML that
Getting error while deploying web service made using Axis2.1.3
--
Key: AXIS2-3282
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3282
Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
Issue Type: Bug
Thanks Dimuthu for you reply.
After I add the System.setProperty with the proper keystore and password
and if I execute the java test client I get below exception.
Any idea what is the reason for this error? Am I missing anything in the
configuration?
[java] org.apache.axis2.AxisFault:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3217?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3217.
-
Resolution: Invalid
please use parmeterOrder to specifiy the orde
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3247.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi
fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3062.
-
Resolution: Won't Fix
the only option is to use the -p option to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1279?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-1279.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed the issue
> Multiple XSD's in codegen
>
+1,
Not only that I am not that happy with the current "Options" object and
the way it handle the properties. I think we should use Options object
only as a mechanism to configure the ServiceClient and all the
properties there in option object need to copy into either
servicecontext or message cont
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3183.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed with the nighly build.
> Client stub gen
Hi all,
I'd like to propose adding a getLocalProperty() method to
AbstractContext to improve the efficiency of sets of handlers. It
would return only a property held at that level in the Context
hierarchy. There are a number of situations where handlers are
communicating with each other where it do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3154?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3154.
-
Resolution: Fixed
now adb pritty print only if user explicitly sw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3048?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3048.
-
Resolution: Fixed
has fixed the issue
> wsdl2java exception with
This class is in rmi module in the Axis2, i.e it will be in the
axis2-rmi-*.jar
src location will be
./modules/rmi/src/org/apache/axis2/rmi/deploy/RMIServiceDeployer.java
Thanks
Lahiru
On 10/17/07, Pradip Sonar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I need jar file for *org.apache.axis2.rmi.dep
Hello - can anyone please help me to fault-find this further??
-Original Message-
From: Tim Munro (myDIALS) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October 2007 6:01 AM
To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Axis2] Secured Axis2-1.3 Client "Masks" Returned Fault
Messages
No, I hav
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3159.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed in the nighly builds
> Local types in sc
Brian,
No, I'd intend that the wsa:Action and wsa:RelatesTo be extracted just
once in the AddressingDispatchExtractor and set the values on the
MessageContext.
David
On 11/10/2007, Brian De Pradine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello David,
>
> Please see my comments below.
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1449?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-1449.
-
Resolution: Fixed
please reopen the issue if it still exists with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3164?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3164.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi
fi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2578?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535471
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi commented on AXIS2-2578:
-
can you please test this with a nighly bui
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3206.
-
Resolution: Fixed
removed the facset processing from the boolean
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3227?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3227.
-
Resolution: Fixed
issue is fixed
> Prefix error serializing ADB
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12535466
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi commented on AXIS2-3161:
-
Can you send your wsdl?
> NullPointerExce
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3172.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Assignee: Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-3237?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-3237.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed the issue
> Generating adb client or ser
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amila Chinthaka Suriarachchi resolved AXIS2-2912.
-
Resolution: Fixed
fixed the issue
> ADB Binding doesn't generate
Keith
I agree that if I do a GET I want to get back plain ole XML and not SOAP1.1.
Since the model you are proposing also supports GET returning SOAP 1.2 (with
the appropriate Accept header), I think this works just fine.
+1
Paul
On 10/17/07, keith chapman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Dev
32 matches
Mail list logo