RE: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-04 Thread Tom Jordahl
-Original Message- From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 1:43 AM To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org Subject: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser Hey all: First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line a little more like Axis

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Srinath Perera
03, 2005 2:13 AM > > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > > Subject: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser > > > > Hey all: > > > > First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line > > a little more like Axis 1's? In particular, I'd

RE: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Chathura Herath
if they are going to try out Axis2. Chathura > -Original Message- > From: Glen Daniels [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 2:13 AM > To: axis-dev@ws.apache.org > Subject: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser > > Hey all: > > Firs

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Ajith Ranabahu
Hi Glen, I guess there's no particular reason why we have a new commandline parser. I guess Chathura wrote a small one to test the code generator and it's still there. Infact we have been asked to make it go with the commons commandline. The core of the tool is independent from the interfaces so we

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to simplify. Let's make the necessary changes. +1 to re-use code from Axis1.X -- dims On 8/2/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all: > > First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line > a little more like Axis 1's? In particular, I'd like to be able to

[axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Glen Daniels
Hey all: First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line a little more like Axis 1's? In particular, I'd like to be able to just do: # wsdl2Java myService.wsdl ...and have it work. This means that the "-uri" option would go away, and everything else would default re