Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Asankha C. Perera
Hi Amila > > > In the very first scenario upto 640 concurrency level both have > same through put while for 1280 threads UE has a sudden increment > and for 2560 other ESB has a relatively high change. What could be > the reason for that? > Which set are you referring to - the W

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Asankha C. Perera wrote: > Hi Amila > > how many messages you sent for one scenario test? > > i.e for eg 500b message with 640 threads > This depends on the concurrency, and can be found exactly by looking at > the script used to run the load test. For example, wh

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Asankha C. Perera
Hi Amila > how many messages you sent for one scenario test? > i.e for eg 500b message with 640 threads This depends on the concurrency, and can be found exactly by looking at the script used to run the load test. For example, when 20 users were being used, the iterations were 1000, while for 2560

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Amila Suriarachchi
> cheers > asankha > > > Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security > performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web > Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performance: > http://www.ibm.com/developer

RE: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Martin Gainty
han WSS4J. However, currently it does not yet ship as a separate > > library - although we may decide to do that if there is user interest > > and demand. > > > > Here is a comparison of it in use against WS-Security based on > > WSS4J/Rampart > > > > http://a

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-11 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
cles-and-tutorials/15-tutorials/48-esb-performance.html cheers asankha Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performanc

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-10 Thread Asankha C. Perera
http://adroitlogic.org/samples-articles-and-tutorials/15-tutorials/48-esb-performance.html cheers asankha > Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security > performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java > Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampar

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-02-01 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
't do policy based validations. Would be glad if you could please confirm it. Thanks & regards. -Prabath Dennis Sosnoski wrote: Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services ser

Re: Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-01-30 Thread Prabath Siriwardena
- it could open up holes for attacks like XML wrapping attacks. I found few occasions that Metro doesn't do policy based validations. Would be glad if you could please confirm it. Thanks & regards. -Prabath Dennis Sosnoski wrote: Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/R

Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance

2010-01-30 Thread Dennis Sosnoski
Following up on some earlier discussions of Axis2/Rampart WS-Security performance, devWorks has now published my latest article in the Java Web Services series, comparing Axis2/Rampart with Metro WS-Security performance: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jws11/ The results are