RE: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-04 Thread Tom Jordahl
+1 to making WSDL2Java look much more like Axis 1.x. Use the Axis command line parser - please do not bring in another jar for this as we went down that road in 1.0 and it was a pain. In fact I believe the parser in 1.x *is* the commons implementation. Tom Jordahl Macromedia Server Development

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Srinath Perera
+1 On 8/3/05, Chathura Herath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Glen, > > This was the initial parser that I wrote get the tool working. It remained > to this date. > I am very much +1 for using either commons or Axis1. Personally would like > to get the Axis1 code rather than to (if??)increase the

RE: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Chathura Herath
Hi Glen, This was the initial parser that I wrote get the tool working. It remained to this date. I am very much +1 for using either commons or Axis1. Personally would like to get the Axis1 code rather than to (if??)increase the jar dependencies. Yup let us try not to alienate the Axis1 users i

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Ajith Ranabahu
Hi Glen, I guess there's no particular reason why we have a new commandline parser. I guess Chathura wrote a small one to test the code generator and it's still there. Infact we have been asked to make it go with the commons commandline. The core of the tool is independent from the interfaces so we

Re: [axis2] WSDL2Java / Command Line Parser

2005-08-02 Thread Davanum Srinivas
+1 to simplify. Let's make the necessary changes. +1 to re-use code from Axis1.X -- dims On 8/2/05, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hey all: > > First off, what do people think about having the WSDL2Java command line > a little more like Axis 1's? In particular, I'd like to be able to