RE: WSDL2Java with DocumentLiteral Issue

2005-11-19 Thread Griffin, Mark
Follow-up, I figured this out. I need to specify the -W option since I was using doc/literal and not wrapped. Works fine now. markg -Original Message- From: Griffin, Mark Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 1:30 PM To: 'axis-user@ws.apache.org' Subject: WSDL2Java with DocumentLiteral Issue

Re: WSDL2Java and wrapped vs document style

2005-11-19 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
No. wrapped is not a valid option for the WSDL style attribute. The WSDL is correct.On 11/18/05, Ebert, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I think you need to say 'wrapped' in the binding instead of 'document'. Chris-Original Message-From: Greg Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Friday,

Re: WSDL2Java and wrapped vs document style

2005-11-19 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
I suspect that Axis's ability to recognize the wrapped convention isn't sophisticated enough to deal with header parts. Please submit an enhancement request. AnneOn 11/18/05, Greg Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Well, what I mean is that the deploy.wsdd created by WSDL2Java from the WSDL below has

Delete FB8C4097227557459572DC6041E796E1074C4F65

2005-11-19 Thread Kahn, Ralph

Re: Authenticating users

2005-11-19 Thread Michael Rudolf
Is there any difference in case the Web Services are made out of Session EJBs? Or does WSS4J work the same way in that case? Thanks! Michael you may want to look at WSS4J and UsernameTokens. they're pretty straight-forward as long as your client can support them. they are part of the

Re: Authenticating users

2005-11-19 Thread Ron Reynolds
by Web Services are made out of Session EJBs you mean you have Session EJBs that expose a SOAP-over-HTTP interface? WSS4J uses 2 handlers, one client-side and one server-side (WSDoAllSender (client) and WSDoAllReceiver (server)) which plug into the handler chain supported by Axis to intercept