Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dino & Anne, Thank you for the response. That clarifies lot of questions. - Kumar.

RE: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-14 Thread Dino Chiesa
e- From: Dark Devil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 10:13 AM To: Anne Thomas Manes Cc: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer Anne, Thank you for the response. So is it that the response soap message struct

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-13 Thread Dark Devil
Anne, Thank you for the response. So is it that the response soap message structure/format should be in accordance with the wsdl most of the times or it can be different provided we have custom (de)serializer on the client side ? Thanks, Kumar.

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-13 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
Kumar, It depends on how well you've described your schema. As long as you're using document style, and your WSDL accurately represents the message structure, then a .NET client should be able to handle the response without needing a special deserializer. Anne On 4/13/05, Dark Devil <[EMAIL PROT

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-13 Thread Dark Devil
Anne & All - Say I have used custom (de)serializers with the help of jaxb, castor etc. and generated a customized response soap message from server that uses axis then how can we assume a simple AXIS client (that does not use any custom (de)serializers)) or a .NET client understand our customized

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-12 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
pproach to > follow. > > Thanks > > Dheeraj > > -Original Message- > From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:48 PM > To: axis-user@ws.apache.org > Subject: Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

RE: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-12 Thread Soti, Dheeraj
ervice" is correct and a good approach to follow. Thanks Dheeraj -Original Message- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 2:48 PM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer Don't

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-12 Thread Jeff Greif
I think this is a bug in Axis. By cyclic loops in the schema, the poster probably means recursive types, but there could be implicit loops in an instance document via IDREFs. Recursive (or mutually recursive) types are sometimes desirable. Consider an organization chart, or the descenants or

Re: General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-12 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
Don't put cyclic loops in your schema. On Apr 12, 2005 4:39 PM, Soti, Dheeraj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I have a schema which has cyclic loops and AXIS goes into a circular loop > while > trying to serialize the objects (throws Stack overflow exception). I can write > my own serialize

General Question about having custom Serializer/Deserializer

2005-04-12 Thread Soti, Dheeraj
Hi, I have a schema which has cyclic loops and AXIS goes into a circular loop while trying to serialize the objects (throws Stack overflow exception). I can write my own serializer/deserializer but I am confused that how it is going to work on client's end. In addition to WSDL wouldn't the client