[EMAIL PROTECTED] please subscribe first using rampart-dev-subscribe@
On 3/1/07, Thilina Gunarathne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
> thanks for the answer. I know that Rampart is able to secure MTOM
> messages. But utilizing MTOM is not usable for large messages. The
> amount of requir
Hi Sebastian,
thanks for the answer. I know that Rampart is able to secure MTOM
messages. But utilizing MTOM is not usable for large messages. The
amount of required memory is that high it is not usable for our
project...
There can't be any difference between the memory consumption of SwA &
MTOM
schke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 01, 2007 5:04 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2][Rampart] Rampart and SwA
Hi Thilina,
thanks for the answer. I know that Rampart is able to secure MTOM
messages. But utilizing MTOM is not usable for large messages. The
amount of req
007 5:04 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Axis2][Rampart] Rampart and SwA
Hi Thilina,
thanks for the answer. I know that Rampart is able to secure MTOM
messages. But utilizing MTOM is not usable for large messages. The
amount of required memory is that high it is not usable for our
pro
Hi Thilina,
thanks for the answer. I know that Rampart is able to secure MTOM
messages. But utilizing MTOM is not usable for large messages. The
amount of required memory is that high it is not usable for our
project... I don't know the excact reasons for that, but in our
performance tests the MTO
Rampart has the capability to secure attachments send using MTOM..
I'm not sure whether is there or planned support for SwA..
Thanks,
Thilina
On 3/1/07, Sebastian Roschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
due to memory efficiency I work with SwA to send messages based on java
streams. Is ther
