Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-04 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
*Para:* axis-user@ws.apache.org> *Asunto:* Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding>> Quite a few SOAP engines don't support rpc/literal, therefore > doc/literal (wrapped or unwrapped) is a better idea than> rpc/literal. I generally recommend using wrapped

Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-03 Thread Christian Kloner
t and not the name of the xsd element itself. -Mensaje original- *De:* Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Enviado el:* viernes, 03 de febrero de 2006 4:08 *Para:* axis-user@ws.apache.org *Asunto:* Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding Quite a few

RE: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-03 Thread Alejandro Ariel de Lio
homas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Enviado el: viernes, 03 de febrero de 2006 4:08Para: axis-user@ws.apache.orgAsunto: Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding Quite a few SOAP engines don't support rpc/literal, therefore doc/literal (wrapped or unwrapped) is a better ide

Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-02 Thread Anne Thomas Manes
Quite a few SOAP engines don't support rpc/literal, therefore doc/literal (wrapped or unwrapped) is a better idea than rpc/literal. I generally recommend using wrapped doc/literal for best interop and easiest development and configuration. Note that .NET supports wrapped doc/literal by default. A

Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-02 Thread Cyrille Le Clerc
WS-I Basic Profile, the reference for SOAP interoperability, says it prefers "literal" rather than "encoded" : Extract : "As a result, the Profile prefers the use of literal, non-encoded XML." Chapter : "4.1.7 SOAP encodingStyle Attribute" URL : http://www.ws-i.org/Profiles/BasicProfile-1.0-

Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-02 Thread Jyotishman Pathak
Dov, I found this article [1] from IBM to be quite useful. At the same time, I am interested in knowing more about your investigation. Thanks, - Jyoti [1] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-whichwsdl/?ca=dgr-devx-WebServicesMVP03 On 2/2/06, Balaji D L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-02 Thread Balaji D L
Can you share your analyse with us ?? It will be very useful. Regards Balaji- Original Message From: Dov Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSent: 02 February 2006 14:21:37Subject: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC EncodingI have done a bunch of investigating

RE: Document Literal vs Document Wrapped vs RPC Encoding

2006-02-02 Thread glenn bech
The far best article I've read so far on the topic of deciding "what style" to use is this one http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/webservices/library/ws-whichwsdl/ It goes through all different combinations of style and encoding, with complete XML listings for the SOAP Messages etc. I advice