Hi ChadDavis ;
If you starting a web service project , then the best option is Axis2.
Axis2 has almost all the features that Axis1 had and more and more
additional features. so try to use Axis2
Thanks
Deepal
> If I'm starting my web services project from scratch, with no concern
> for legacy stu
, 2006 1:40 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: axis versus axis2
Brennan,
Could you please log a bug for #2 with your wsdl/xsd's? (I just
checked in a change that may help!). That will help us fix both #2 and
#3.
thanks,
dims
On 9/6/06, Spies, Brennan &l
Brennan,
Could you please log a bug for #2 with your wsdl/xsd's? (I just
checked in a change that may help!). That will help us fix both #2 and
#3.
thanks,
dims
On 9/6/06, Spies, Brennan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm not sure if I qualify as a "die hard" fan of Axis, but I've chosen it
over X
I'm not sure if I qualify as a "die hard" fan of Axis, but I've chosen it
over XFire because I like the pluggable architecture and some of the other
features, such as more transport options (TCP).
I am doing a top-down web service using XML Schema and WSDL as the starting
point. The xsd is moderat
thanks
--
Paul Vial
PowerHealth Solutions
Office : 27 Angas Street, Adelaide, South Australia, 5000
Postal : GPO Box 884, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001
Mobile : 0404 838 245
Telephone: +61(0)8 8410 6404
Facsimile: +61(0)8 8410 6403
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Site : http://w
How about take a look at these mail messages;
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11564663591&r=1&w=2
--- Paul Vial <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> just starting to play around with web services (and AXIS).
>
> Installed AXIS and ran some of the demos without any problems but
> have since dis
