RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?

2005-10-07 Thread Sunil D'Monte
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 18:20 > To: axis-user@ws.apache.org > Subject: RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ? > > > On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Grossberger, Guenter wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > Although Sunil is right about star

RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?

2005-10-07 Thread Dr Janusz Martyniak
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Grossberger, Guenter wrote: Hi! Although Sunil is right about starting from a WSDL you can still use Java2WSDL but you have to select "document" style and "literal" use or even better "wrapped" style instead of rpc/encoding. Best regards, Thanks Guenter, I discovered

RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?

2005-10-07 Thread Grossberger, Guenter
2005 12:33 PM > To: 'axis-user@ws.apache.org' > Subject: RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ? > > Is it possible for you to skip Java2WSDL altogether? The recommended > approach for interoperability is to hand-code the WSDL (there > are editors to > help you do this

RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?

2005-10-07 Thread Sunil D'Monte
Is it possible for you to skip Java2WSDL altogether? The recommended approach for interoperability is to hand-code the WSDL (there are editors to help you do this). You could then run the WS-I testing tool to check whether your WSDL really is interoperable. If you do this, then nobody should have a