[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 18:20
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Grossberger, Guenter wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Although Sunil is right about star
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Grossberger, Guenter wrote:
Hi!
Although Sunil is right about starting from a WSDL you can still use Java2WSDL but you have to select
"document" style and "literal" use or even better "wrapped" style instead of
rpc/encoding.
Best regards,
Thanks Guenter,
I discovered
2005 12:33 PM
> To: 'axis-user@ws.apache.org'
> Subject: RE: soapenc:string rather then xsd:string ?
>
> Is it possible for you to skip Java2WSDL altogether? The recommended
> approach for interoperability is to hand-code the WSDL (there
> are editors to
> help you do this
Is it possible for you to skip Java2WSDL altogether? The recommended
approach for interoperability is to hand-code the WSDL (there are editors to
help you do this). You could then run the WS-I testing tool to check whether
your WSDL really is interoperable. If you do this, then nobody should have
a