to the parser?
Thanks
Matt
-Original Message-From: Matthew Brown
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006
12:41 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Two
questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
1. >From searching
the mailing list archives, I
?
Thanks
Matt
-Original Message-From: Matthew Brown
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2006
12:41 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Two
questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
1. From searching
the mailing list archives, I see several references
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday,
July 01, 2006 12:41 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Two questions
- BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
1. From searching the mailing list
archives, I see several references to people having problems with Byte
Order Ma
... this isn't a static
piece of text.
-Original Message-
From: Axel Bock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:17 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
Yes, there is a work-around. It works if you encode
PROTECTED]]Sent: Saturday,
July 01, 2006 12:41 PMTo: axis-user@ws.apache.orgSubject: Two questions
- BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
1. From searching the mailing list
archives, I see several references to people having problems with Byte
Order Mark characters
]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 10:58 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:16, Axel Bock wrote:
Yes, there is a work-around. It works if you encode the file with
UTF-8 (for example), and do not include
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 22:16, Axel Bock wrote:
Yes, there is a work-around. It works if you encode the file with
UTF-8 (for example), and do not include the BOM at the beginning. I
use
Two bytes per char; Etherpeak is showing the second byte as 00.
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:09 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July
.
May be someone else can give advice on how to attempt such a thing.
Manuel
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:09 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:09 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:04, Matthew Brown wrote:
Manuel,
I believe you hit the problem on the head - the response prolog
says utf-8
give advice on how to attempt such a thing.
Manuel
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:09 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:04
is in? Will it look at the prolog, the
byte order mark, etc?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:24 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006
]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:24 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:12, Matthew Brown wrote:
Two bytes per char; Etherpeak is showing the second byte as 00.
Seems you are stuck between a rock
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:24 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:12, Matthew Brown wrote:
Two bytes per char; Etherpeak is showing the second byte as 00.
Seems you are stuck between a rock
at the prolog, the
byte order mark, etc?
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:24 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:12
.
Manuel
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Mall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:09 AM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:04, Matthew Brown wrote:
Manuel,
I believe you hit
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 2:46 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: RE: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
What does the content-type header say the charset is? That takes precedence
over the payload (at least for SOAP 1.1)
Cheers
Simon
-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
Maybe changing the xml prolog from utf-8 to utf-16 will be easier.
It seems like a demo example for a servlet filter ;-)
Hope this helps,
Rodrigo
Manuel Mall wrote:
On Wednesday 05 July 2006 23:12, Matthew
, July 05, 2006 3:41 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
did you see my response on setting the CHARACTER_SET_ENCODING? what is
the exact stack trace you get on the client?
thanks,
dims
On 7/5/06, Matthew Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:41 PM
To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Two questions - BOM in UTF-8, and manually cleaning XML
did you see my response on setting the CHARACTER_SET_ENCODING? what
is the exact stack trace you get on the client?
thanks,
dims
1. >From searching
the mailing list archives, I see several references to people having problems
with Byte Order Mark characters appearing before the prolog in their UTF-8
messages. However I can't seem to find much of a known resolution to these
issues. Is there a standard/common
21 matches
Mail list logo
