SV: SV: SV: AXIS classloaders breaking J2EE application isolation

2003-03-24 Thread David Ekholm
> It looks like the orion team just came back. They tend to > shut down communication during winter, and show up with a new > release at spring. So I decided to play around with new > release 2.0 and its classloaders. Orion seems to behave as > expected, even with shared libraries and shared ej

SV: SV: AXIS classloaders breaking J2EE application isolation

2003-03-20 Thread David Ekholm
> Ok. I see what your are talking about. The problem is, Magnus > does not respond anymore (probably got too rich after the > oracle deal ;). So it would be good to make sure orion does > use different classloaders to load the common jar resources > you are referring to. From what you are descri

SV: AXIS classloaders breaking J2EE application isolation

2003-03-19 Thread David Ekholm
> Hmm. > What do you mean by "share a common classpath"? They all refer to the same > jar within an EAR? Or you added the class to the system classpath? In our system we don't pack each application to EARs, we leave them unpacked. Each application.xml refers to the same classpath, -a path to

AXIS classloaders breaking J2EE application isolation

2003-03-19 Thread David Ekholm
bug breaking the isolation between applications. One can argue if using static variables is orthodox, but I see no reason why to break the native classloader hierarchy   Regards /David Ekholm, System architect, Net Entertainment AB   Sidenote: We are using the latest version of AXIS and Orionserver as J2EE platform, essencially the same platform as Oracle 9i.