Sorry, Thomas, I have no idea why the generated
WSDL is misleading. I'm fairly new to Axis so there could well be a good
reason that I'm not aware of. I think it uses the same code as Java2WSDL
does, so you could try experimenting with that tool (part of the Axis distribution)
to find out wha
: Dienstag, 7. September
2004 12:35
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: ?wsdl
It's just a simple element, under the element, Thomas.
For example,
...
myResources/myService.wsdl
...
There
is a little bit more description in the Axis Reference Guide under
"Individu
It's just a simple element, under the
element, Thomas. For example,
...
myResources/myService.wsdl
...
There is a little bit more description in
the Axis Reference Guide under "Individual Service Configuration".
Tony
Hi Tony,
thank you for your reply.
Can you give me an exampl
Hi Tony,
thank you for your reply.
Can you give me an
example from your server-config.wsdd,
How I have to set this?
But the question is, is
the wsdl generated by the Service OK? And why?
Thanks Thomas
--
Hi Walter,
tried that too and placed it under
webapps/axis/Web-inf/classes (as described
in the log4j doc).
regards
Werner
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Stocker, Walter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 10. Juli 2002 15:28
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
Hi Werner,
> PS: did the logging mechanisms change recently? I modified
> log4j.properties, replaced it in axis.jar (WEB-INF/lib),
> restarted - nothing happend...
They changed the log4j-library to log4j-1.2.4.jar, but
log4j-1.2.5.jar (the newest release) works also. Maybe this
is the reason fo
sdl,
> from the Axis server I deployed on a Sun workstation and
> tried it with Spy
> 4.2
>
> C.C. Liu
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Wörner Till [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2002 8:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi,
I totally agree with you that the xml Java2WSDL spits out is absolutely legal.
I just wanted to make my life a bit easier, cause I like to test my Web Services with
XML Spy sometimes.
And I also think that this is a XML Spy problem, but as the element prefixes are
unnecessary (not the attri
