; > -----Original Message-
> > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 3:41 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis Comply
&g
nivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 3:52 PM
To: Simon Fell
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis Comply
withthis rule?
completely agree, that's why i forwarded the email to axis-dev@
http://marc.theaimsgroup.c
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Did so months ago.
> > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1454
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-
> > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
D]
> Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis
> Comply withthis rule?
>
> If you want a switch for the old behavior of classes, please help...
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
>
> On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:37:48 -0500, Davanum Srinivas
>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:00 PM
> > > To: Simon Fell
> > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis
> > > Comply withthis rule?
> > >
> > > Class names is for JAXRPC11 co
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:00 PM
> > To: Simon Fell
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis
> > Comply withthis rule?
> >
> &
Did so months ago.
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1454
> -Original Message-
> From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:00 PM
> To: Simon Fell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum&qu
> names, no longer generates new classes for some types.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Saturday, February 05, 2005 5:51 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum"
bject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis
> Comply withthis rule?
>
> John,
>
> Yes, it's possible to do it wholesale (done it twice locally :).
> Everyone was/is worried about backwards compat stuff. but i
> have a feeling we shou
What confused me was you saying that it works for constants but not
for variables. Currently, a typecast is necessary in this situation
even for JRE 1.4, and for every Style object returned by methods,
variables or constants in Style class. I do not say this is good or
bad.
-- venkat
On Fri, 4 F
John,
Yes, it's possible to do it wholesale (done it twice locally :).
Everyone was/is worried about backwards compat stuff. but i have a
feeling we should bite the bullet. i have forwarded the email to
axis-dev
-- dims
On Sat, 05 Feb 2005 19:54:11 +1100, John Delaney
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gentlepeople,
I have a version of Axis compiled with enum replaced by enums, using
constants would have been better.
I just copied the whole thing, tools and all, into a decent IDE and did
a global replace of org.apache.axis.enum with org.apache.axis.enums, I
then used ant to compile axis.
BTW I
On Friday 04 February 2005 18:18, Venkat Reddy wrote:
> Is it not because you are passing an instance of super class while it
> expects an instance of a derived class?
Yes, it is exactly because of that. I can't change the class of the
various constants such as Style.DOCUMENT and USE.LITERAL. Wha
Is it not because you are passing an instance of a super class while it
expects an instance of a derived class?
- Venkat
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:28:45 +0100, Michael Schuerig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Try to compile this:
>
> package test;
>
> import org.apache.axis.constants.Style;
>
> p
Is it not because you are passing an instance of super class while it
expects an instance of a derived class?
-- venkat
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 17:28:45 +0100, Michael Schuerig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 04 February 2005 12:52, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:06:11 +0
On Friday 04 February 2005 12:52, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:06:11 +0100, Michael Schuerig
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 03 February 2005 04:27, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > > you can replace xxx.enum.yyy with xxx.constants.yyy
> >
> > This only works in cases whe
can u give me an example?
-- dims
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 10:06:11 +0100, Michael Schuerig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday 03 February 2005 04:27, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > you can replace xxx.enum.yyy with xxx.constants.yyy
>
> This only works in cases where one simply uses the constants
On Thursday 03 February 2005 04:27, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> you can replace xxx.enum.yyy with xxx.constants.yyy
This only works in cases where one simply uses the constants. It does
not work for variable, field, and parameter types.
Michael
--
Michael Schuerig Not only does l
virus free. It may be a private
> communication, and if so, does not represent the views of the CMCRC and its
> associates.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: John Delaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:30
> > To: [EMAIL PR
CMCRC and its
associates.
> -Original Message-
> From: John Delaney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, 3 February 2005 11:30
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis Comply withthis
> rule?
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
